| Summary: | 碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 建築系建築及都市設計碩博士班 === 107 === In the 21st century, we have enough analytical tools to solve the problem and answer the questions between the human behavior distribution tendency and spatial configuration form based on Space Syntax theory founded by UCL Professor Bill Hillier (axial lines、 visual integration、 convex space etc.) before or after a real environment been built. In this research, it is the main intention to figure out the relationship between the spatial configuration form and human behavior distribution tendency (“matrix equal distributon layout” 、“symmertrical layout” 、 “asymmetrical layout”) of an exhibition space. Can we use the analytical tools of Space Syntax (visibility graph analysis and gate counts) to forecast the behavior? What is the difference of spatial information between those different spatial configurations? For this subject, a practical research is setting the rules of basical spatial form and observing three different typical layout of exhibition space with human behavior distribution tendency and crowds moving record. We input record values into analytical tool and run the R-square paramenters of gate counts values vs. observed ones, in order to prove the predicted values and the observed ones prediction accuracy. There are three different typical layouts of spatial configuration experiments in this research, project A、B and C, which were from the three different typical cases “matrix equal distributon layout” “symmertrical layout” and “asymmetrical layout” respectively. We used a spatial quantified analytical tool, UCL Depthmap 10 to forecast the human behavior trends and crowds moving then compare forecasted values and the observed values. The R-square(observation-Agent) values of project A、B and C values are 0.089、0.236、0.527 respectively, only the third project “asymmetrical layout” is highter than 0.5，it’s a positive correlation experimental record that can prove the theory hypothesis.The other two typical project “matrix equal distributon layout” “symmertrical layout” are easier to make user get lost and hard for way-finding, and also reduce the quality of exhibition visiting. But the quality is increased in project “asymmetrical layout”. Visitor can control the whole spatial configurations by the visual information in local part of whole space. The quality of exhibition visiting would be better relatively.
|
|---|
