| Summary: | 碩士 === 中原大學 === 建築研究所 === 107 === With the development of society and civilization, people’s living standards have generally improved. Apart from demand for the space for personal life, people are gradually attaching importance to the demand and quality requirements of public open space in urban areas. How to effectively provide public activities, leisure and social interactions has become an indispensable part of outdoor daily life. The increasing popular night life has subverted people’s life style of working after sunrise and sleeping after sunset in the past, highlighting the importance of night space to the life of modern people.
This study explored the effects of two different lighting modes and facilities in night open space, namely landscape overhead lamp and landscape trail lamp, on the stay behavior in two different situations of “waiting for friends” and “talking with friends”. Secondly, based on related research on open space, this study selected the most representative facilities and investigated the influence of night light environment on the stay position in open space through the changes in combination of lighting, situation and facilities and by means of virtual reality.
The conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) The results of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 show that people’s choice of stay position in open space at night is mainly affected by the brightness of the overall light environment. 2) In the open space at night, when people are “waiting for friends”, the priority of the place they choose to stay is as follows: Bright corner space > space surrounding the bright lamps > secondary lighting space with seats > secondary lighting open space with facilities > secondary lighting corner space > secondary lighting open space. 3) In the open space at night, when people are “talking with friends”, the priority of the place they choose to stay is as follows: bright space with seats > secondary lighting space with seats > bright corner space > secondary lighting open space with facilities > space surrounding the bright lamps > secondary lighting corner space > secondary lighting open space. 4) When the light source is “landscape overhead lamps”, the subjects’ preferences for facilities are as follows: (1) In corner space, in the situation of “waiting for friends”, the subjects’ preferences for X-axis facilities are: seats > walls > bushes > trees. In the situation of “talking with friends”, the preferences are seats > bushes > walls > trees; (2) In the secondary lighting open space with facilities, the subjects’ preferences for facilities are seats > trees > walls > bushes in the situation of “waiting for friends”, while in the situation of “talking with friends”, the preferences are seats > bushes > trees = walls. 5) When the light source is “landscape trail lamps", the subjects’ preferences for facilities are as follows: (1) In corner space, the subjects’ preferences are seats > bushes > wall > trees; (2) In the secondary lighting open space with facilities, the subjects’ preferences for facilities under both situations are seats > trees ≧wall ≧bushes. 6) In any scenario or situation, seat setting will greatly improve people’s proximity and reduce the impact of other facilities on people.
|
|---|
