The Relationship Between Risk Assessment of Community-Based Treatment and Recidivism of Sexual Crime

碩士 === 中央警察大學 === 犯罪防治研究所 === 107 === This study presents data comprised of sexual offenders who had participated in community-based treatment in Department of Public Health of Taoyuan from 2014 to 2017 (a total of 2,112 times and 1,053 samples were selected) to find the association between the data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TSENG, YU-CHE, 曾昱哲
Other Authors: SHEN, SHENG-ANG
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2019
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/27z55b
Description
Summary:碩士 === 中央警察大學 === 犯罪防治研究所 === 107 === This study presents data comprised of sexual offenders who had participated in community-based treatment in Department of Public Health of Taoyuan from 2014 to 2017 (a total of 2,112 times and 1,053 samples were selected) to find the association between the data of community-based treatment and the retrospective sexual criminal records. Identifying the risk factors affecting “sexual crime records” and “the score of risk assessment scales” and its degree of influence, so as to construct indicative risk factors for sexual recidivism. The study indicated that (1) the retrospectively annual sexual recidivism rates of all samples are 3.2% for 1 year, 5.9% for 3 years, 6.9% for 5 years, 9.0% for 7 years, 11.9% for 10 years, and 15.7% for 15 years; (2) the retrospectively annual sexual recidivism rates of different types of offenders were also analyzed, and the highest rate of recidivism in juvenile delinquents types is 4.6% for 1 year, 8.1% for 3 years, 8.9% for 5 years, 14.7% for 10 years and 20.2% for 15 years, with recidivism reaching a peak in two years after the first sexual offence; (3) the score of the acute dynamic risk scale can be used as the recidivism criterion for the "past" sexual recidivism; (4) the recidivism rate is higher in the following situations: “the type of sexual offence (juvenile delinquents)”, “unmarried”, “reoffending after parole”, “having a fixed sexual crime model”, and “still hanging out with imprisonment peers”; (5) the score of risk assessment scales is higher in the following situations: “sexual recidivism”, “sexual crime types (adult rape)”, “violence in sex offending”, “victim injury or death”, “sexually abused as child”, ”early school maladjustment”, ”unmarried”, ”the first official criminal charge happened under 18 years old”, ”having a fixed sexual crime model”, “victim access in future environment”, ”impulsive / irritable characteristics”, ”still excited to deviant thought and fantasies”, ”unemployment”, ”unstable residence”, ”no regular leisure activities”, and ”no social support network; (6) “Average IQ” and “age under 40” were negatively correlated with the score of risk assessment scales. According to the findings of this study, suggestions are recommended as following: (1) based on the peak of sexual recidivism, strengthen to monitor juvenile delinquents; (2) grasp the critical time to intervene as the score of acute dynamic risk assessment scale oscillates; (3) according to indicative risk factors of the study, provide concrete and feasible advice to members of community-based treatment (guardians, police and therapists) base of their power, affairs and characteristic of work; (4) emphasize the collection of data regarding the influential risk factors for sexual recidivism; (5) pay attention to education in the early stage of life course.