| Summary: | 博士 === 淡江大學 === 土木工程學系博士班 === 106 === This thesis deals with the key core and the variation mechanism of Living Heritage Conservation (LHC) model, which was treated as an alternative method for traditional town and village conservation project for reviving buildings and culture at the same time. In different period the model has been practiced first in Taiwan since 1990’s and then be adopted by Fu-Zhou Ma-Wei Government to try on Min-An after 2010’s. This model was raised out during middle 1980''s in Taiwan by a movement of heritage preservation which claimed to against the type of Economy Development Priority on tradition civil villages preservation and reusing. And then became as the important prototype of Community Development policy of Taiwan’s Culture Ministry, and promoted all over this country.
The hypothesis of this study is consist two parts which are trends and events, which effect on LHC of the reusing form on tradition heritages. First, through cases study author offers3 conditions of trend that LHC got the soil to grow , it consists : 1. Economy development became a priority policy on culture preservation, 2. The gap between urban and rural development was came out as a big issue for government, 3. public participation management can make up for lack of ability of the government administrative mechanism was acknowledged. As to the specific impacts of variation on conservation are: 1. State intervention, 2. Community design specialist ability, 3. community people consensus.
Finally, the author points out the limits and chances of the LHC model. In term of the main vector to carry and spray the gene of LHC is the community orientated participant who must have community design ability. And those participants could be community''s people of government staffs, specialists and people who care the living heritage development and culture conservation. Through the progressive government, the alliance of local organizations, communities'' movement, community specialists as the site and the hinges of the resistance, to form their community and development.
|
|---|
