| Summary: | 碩士 === 大仁科技大學 === 休閒事業管理研究所 === 106 === The purpose of this research is to explore the awareness of the relationship between the leadership behaviors of their coaches and team cohesion for volleyball team members of elementary schools in Kaohsiung and Pingtung. The goals of the research are: (1) to understand the current situation of different background variations of volleyball team members of elementary schools, (2) to understand the difference of various background variables of the awareness of the coaches’ leadership behaviors for volleyball team members of elementary schools, (3) to understand the difference of various background variables of the awareness of team cohesion for volleyball team members of elementary schools, and (4) to understand the correlation between coaches’ leadership behaviors and team cohesion of the awareness for volleyball team members of elementary schools. The formal questionnaire adopts purposive sampling. 334 questionnaires are distributed, and 334 of them are returned; after eliminating 28 invalid questionnaires, the return rate of the questionnaire is 92%. The relevant research data is then analyzed by the statistics software of SPSS for Windows 12.0 version; the significant level is set at α=.05, and then analyze various background variables in the differences between the coaches’ leadership behaviors and team cohesion. The data is analyzed through descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation and significant level, etc. The results of this research are as follow:
1. The average scores ranking from high to low of the dimensions of awareness of coaches’ leadership behaviors in Kaohsiung and Pingtung are “training and guidance”, “caring behaviors”, “rewarding behaviors”, “diplomatic behaviors”, and “authoritarian behaviors”; the average scores ranking from high to low of the dimensions of team cohesion are “team adaptation”, “interpersonal approachability”, “interpersonal attractiveness”, and “teamwork”.
2. Different background variables reach significant difference in the awareness of coaches’ leadership behaviors in variables of sex, grades, class, days of training, and best scores.
3. Different background variables reach significant difference in team cohesion dimension in variables of days of training and time of participation.
4. Except for the dimensions of authoritarian behaviors and interpersonal attractiveness, the other dimensions of the coaches’ leadership behaviors and team cohesion all reach significant positive correlation.
|
|---|
