A Comparative Study of Trademark Administrative Litigation Providing New Evidence Between Mainland and Taiwan.
碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 法律學系碩士在職專班 === 106 === Due to the characters of intellectual property cases, Article 33 of the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act allows the parties, before the end of the oral argument, to present new evidence for the same reasons for revocation or abolition. Article 33 b...
Main Authors: | WANG, HSU-HSIEN, 王樹賢 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | WNAG, HSUAN-LIN |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2018
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5a738z |
Similar Items
-
A Study on Trademark Censorship between Taiwan and Mainland China
by: Chun-Chun Chen, et al.
Published: (2013) -
A Study of “Trademark Squatting” between Taiwan and Mainland China
by: Lai, Yi-Jen, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Research on the Inheritance of Trademarks between Taiwan and Mainland China-Focus on the Jointly Owned Regulations of Trademark Act
by: CHAN, CHING-YING, et al.
Published: (2019) -
A Comparative Study on Trademark Dilution Between the United States and Taiwan''s Law : Focusing on Trademark Parody
by: Chih-Han Hsu 徐芷涵, et al.
Published: (2015) -
A Study on the Conflicts between the Enterprise Name and Trademark Right in Taiwan and Mainland China
by: 顏雅欣
Published: (2018)