Summary: | 博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 中國文學研究所 === 106 === There are three research purposes of the thesis. First, to establish a dynamic concept and thought of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without". Second, to carry on a research which combines history and philosophy. Third, to depict the new type of Zhu Xi’s "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without".
Chapter 2 is devoted to define the specific usage of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without" in this thesis, to build the mode of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without" about Confucians before Zhu Xi, and to detect the influence of Song Dynasty circumstances on Zhu Xi. First, to reach back the scheme of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without", and to check the definition and usage of this conception in the academic circle. Second, to discuss the type of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without" from Pre-Qin Confucians to Han and Tang Dynasties. Based on these explanations, we can find where Zhu Xi’s spirit and idea of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without" comes from, and find the characteristic of his type. Third, to make an approach to Song Dynasty that Zhu Xi lived, including political culture, academic development, and the conversion of Confucianist’s consciousness.
Chapter 3 is devoted to analyse Zhu Xi’s personal thoughts to confirm the relationship between inside and outside, and to establish the new type of Zhu Xi’s "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without". First, starting from the debate between Zhu Xi and Chen Liang to know how Zhu Xi arranged the relationship between inner morality and outter legacy. Expanding the category of “Kingliness Without" by delimiting Zhu Xi’s opinions about “legacy” or “exploit”. Offering the theoretical basis of using culture and education to connect inside and outside by explaining Zhu Xi’s notions about culture and education work. Second, finding Zhu Xi’s consciousness of culture and education in his philosophic thoughts. Compared with traditional thinking about "Sageness Within”, Zhu Xi’s philosophic theories are not only belong to "Sageness Within” but also belong to “Kingliness Without".
Chapter 4 is devoted to observe Zhu Xi’s practical actions for presenting his culture and education work which is based on thoughts. The interaction between Zhu Xi’s type of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without" and politics is also emphasis in this Chapter. We will find that Zhu Xi flung himslve into culture and education work and mastered the art of cultural and educational carriers, spaces, and circulation . We can also present the key feature about a close connection between culture and education and politics of Zhu Xi’s type. On the one hand Zhu Xi sured that the value of culture and education is independent of politics, on the other hand he had never abandoned political power and resources for implementing his spirit and idea of "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without". Accordingly, the new type of Zhu Xi’s "Sageness Within; Kingliness Without" can be completely established.
|