A Study of Traffic Safety Education Evaluation on Meta-Evaluation in Public Junior High Schools of R.O.C.

• Main Authors: Kuo, Chien-Ho., 郭建和
• Other Authors: Li, An-Min.
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2017
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/t62urc

碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 教育行政碩士在職專班 === 106 === The purpose of this study is to refer to the third edition of the program evaluation standards which developed by Joint Committee on Standards of Education in 2010, and then to assess the implementation traffic safety education evaluation on meta-evaluation in public junior high schools of R.O.C. The study adopted questionnaire survey, and the tool was“Questionnaire of Traffic Safety Education Evaluation on Meta-Evaluation in Public Junior High Schools of R.O.C.”. The research subjects were based on both public and private junior high schools implementing school evaluation in the 2013-2015 academic years in R.O.C. There are 504 questionnaires being sent and valid feed-back samples are 504.Data were analyzed by the descriptive statistics, one-way MANOVA, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Repeated measures one-way ANOVA. The major findings were as follows: 1. The R.O.C Junior high school traffic safety educatione evaluation “part of the match” to the meta-evaluation standards. 2. The order for the conformation of the R.O.C junior high school evaluation were “propriety standards,” “utility standards.”“evaluation accountability standards,” “feasibility standards,” “ accuracy standards,” 3. The effectiveness of R.O.C Junior high school traffic safety education evaluation was different, and it still has improvement space. 4. The respondents in different school sizes, different working years and different evaluation school years, more consistent views on the R.O.C Junior high school traffic safety education evaluation in line with meta-evaluation standards. 5. The respondents had different working positions, the "mentor or subject teachers" consistent than the " principal, " " Officer " in“entirety,” “propriety standards,” “ accuracy standards.” The respondents had different working positions, the " chief" consistent than the " principal, " in “ accuracy standards.” Finally, some suggestions based on the conclusions are proposed to the educational administration authorities and evaluation business Sponsor,school and future researchers.