Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients

碩士 === 國立臺北護理健康大學 === 運動保健研究所 === 106 === Purposes: To explore the effect of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention on the clinical symptoms of asthma. Methods: Ninety asthma patients were randomly assigned to either conventional respiratory movement group (BTE; 2 sessions/we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HUANG, TING-YU, 黃婷郁
Other Authors: KUO, YU-CHI
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g7f2v3
id ndltd-TW-106NTCN0420009
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-106NTCN04200092019-05-16T00:22:58Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g7f2v3 Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients 比較呼吸運動及吸氣肌訓練對氣喘病患之臨床效益 HUANG, TING-YU 黃婷郁 碩士 國立臺北護理健康大學 運動保健研究所 106 Purposes: To explore the effect of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention on the clinical symptoms of asthma. Methods: Ninety asthma patients were randomly assigned to either conventional respiratory movement group (BTE; 2 sessions/week; 25 min/session) or inspiratory muscle training group (IMT; 5 days/week, 2 sessions/day, 30 breaths/session, and intensity set at 50% PImax). Outcome measurements were performed before and after the intervention, including international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ), three-day physical activity log (3-D PAL), asthma control test (ACT), asthma control questionnaire, ACQ), pulmonary function tests, and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Results: After 12 weeks of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention, the six-minute walking distance increased by 25 m in the BTE group and 37 m in the IMT group, but there was no difference between the two groups. In the IMT group, the FVC progressed by 4.25% (79.38±13.26 vs 83.63±11.54) and the FEV1 improved by 1.61% (79.12±15.84 vs 80.73±12.55), whereas these indicators did not change in the BTE group. The PImax increased by 14.3 cmH2O (71.83±31.29 cmH2O vs 86.13±32.92 cmH2O, p<.05) in the BTE group and by 25.77 cmH2O (62.17±25.37 cmH2O vs 87.93±24.8 cmH2O, P<.05) in the IMT group, but there was no difference between the two groups. Similarly, PEmax, ACT and ACQ were significantly different before and after intervention, but there was no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: After 12 weeks of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention, inspiratory muscle training is more effective in promoting the improvement of cardiopulmonary function, asthma control test and respiratory muscle strength than breathing exercise, but the same effect between the two groups. KUO, YU-CHI 郭堉圻 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 76 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北護理健康大學 === 運動保健研究所 === 106 === Purposes: To explore the effect of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention on the clinical symptoms of asthma. Methods: Ninety asthma patients were randomly assigned to either conventional respiratory movement group (BTE; 2 sessions/week; 25 min/session) or inspiratory muscle training group (IMT; 5 days/week, 2 sessions/day, 30 breaths/session, and intensity set at 50% PImax). Outcome measurements were performed before and after the intervention, including international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ), three-day physical activity log (3-D PAL), asthma control test (ACT), asthma control questionnaire, ACQ), pulmonary function tests, and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Results: After 12 weeks of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention, the six-minute walking distance increased by 25 m in the BTE group and 37 m in the IMT group, but there was no difference between the two groups. In the IMT group, the FVC progressed by 4.25% (79.38±13.26 vs 83.63±11.54) and the FEV1 improved by 1.61% (79.12±15.84 vs 80.73±12.55), whereas these indicators did not change in the BTE group. The PImax increased by 14.3 cmH2O (71.83±31.29 cmH2O vs 86.13±32.92 cmH2O, p<.05) in the BTE group and by 25.77 cmH2O (62.17±25.37 cmH2O vs 87.93±24.8 cmH2O, P<.05) in the IMT group, but there was no difference between the two groups. Similarly, PEmax, ACT and ACQ were significantly different before and after intervention, but there was no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: After 12 weeks of breathing exercise or inspiratory muscle training intervention, inspiratory muscle training is more effective in promoting the improvement of cardiopulmonary function, asthma control test and respiratory muscle strength than breathing exercise, but the same effect between the two groups.
author2 KUO, YU-CHI
author_facet KUO, YU-CHI
HUANG, TING-YU
黃婷郁
author HUANG, TING-YU
黃婷郁
spellingShingle HUANG, TING-YU
黃婷郁
Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients
author_sort HUANG, TING-YU
title Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients
title_short Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients
title_full Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients
title_fullStr Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons For the Clinical Efficiency of Respiration Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Asthmatic Patients
title_sort comparisons for the clinical efficiency of respiration exercise and inspiratory muscle training in asthmatic patients
publishDate 2018
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g7f2v3
work_keys_str_mv AT huangtingyu comparisonsfortheclinicalefficiencyofrespirationexerciseandinspiratorymuscletraininginasthmaticpatients
AT huángtíngyù comparisonsfortheclinicalefficiencyofrespirationexerciseandinspiratorymuscletraininginasthmaticpatients
AT huangtingyu bǐjiàohūxīyùndòngjíxīqìjīxùnliànduìqìchuǎnbìnghuànzhīlínchuángxiàoyì
AT huángtíngyù bǐjiàohūxīyùndòngjíxīqìjīxùnliànduìqìchuǎnbìnghuànzhīlínchuángxiàoyì
_version_ 1719165937992597504