| Summary: | 碩士 === 南華大學 === 生死學系碩士班 === 106 === To decide whether to do treatment or case clousure for sexual offenders are under the professional estimations of the "Sexual Offenders' Assessment Committee". The inapposite estimation and improper treatment maybe result in social security loopholes in our country. The purpose of this study is to explore the following points: (1) To discuss the concern of process that the case closure of sexual offenders of estimation by sexual offenders' assessment committeemen (2) How to adjust the pressure on the estimation of the case closure by Sexual Offenders' Assessment Committeemen. (3) To discuss the concern that case closure of sexual offenders of estimation by sexual offenders' assessment committeemen. The study respondents were six members of sexual abuse assessment, the use of in-depth interview and content analysis of data research to understand members of the sexual aggression assessment concluded the resolution of the relevant views.
The result show that: (1) committeemen and sexual assault therapists for sexual offenders are closed if there are cognitive differences, will first use the common discussion to seek consensus, if still unable to reach a consensus and there are objections, most of the continued treatment as give priority to guiding principles to reduce the suspicion of sexual assault and re-conviction, (2) appraisal members need to get the full justification of the case conclusion by the therapist, not the subjective judgment of the therapist, (3) the appraisal committee adopts consensus In addition to increasing the impartiality and professionalism of the assessment committees in assessing the resolution of cases, they can also reduce the pressure on commissioners to conclude cases, (4) the factors of concern in assessing the resolution of a settlement include the following eleven questions: (1) Does offenders likely to repeat the criminal act? (2) Whether the therapist provides the appraisal committee with sufficient reasons for the case, not the subjective judgment, (3) Whether the scam score is objective enough, (4) Whether the norms of the perpetrator have become better or not, (5) whether the offender have solid work, (6) Whether the perpetrators have a solid relationship, (7)Whether the perpetrators in terms of sexuality reasonable and legal solution to the pipeline, (8) The possibility of the perpetrator approaching the victim, (9) Whether the offender has self-control ability, (10) Whether the offender has the support of his family, and (11) whether the offender has a good life environment and other factors.
Conclusion of that, committeemen evaluate the key elements of the resolution, with the emphasis on assessing the possibility of recidivism of sexual offender , which means that the rate of recidivism of sexual offender is the most important factor in assessing the resolution. Therefore, the integrity and implementation of the overall security system, the perfection of the family functions of the offenders, the establishment of the concept of "sexual" decriminalization, the implementation of the prefecture-level special areas and the establishment of the interpersonal relationships between the parties will all be the incidence of sexual offender and recidivism specific rate of reduction as.
|
|---|
