| Summary: | 博士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 教育政策與行政學系 === 106 === While higher education in some countries transfered from elite education, universal education to mass education, from the free tuition to "user charge" , and with the commonly adopted high tuition policy, thus the students’ loan policy for higher education of every country came into being.
The purpose of this research was to probe into the content, process, influencing factors as well as the situation of achievement on the policy-making of Taiwan higher education's student loans. Firstly, through literature analysis and the studying on rationality of policy-making, along with the evolution ,development , plight of the data to students’ loan policy of the main countries; thus, the Delphi technique questionnaire and interview outline were compiled. Furthermore, fifteen experts and scholars in the education sector were chosen as the research objects, and seven experts and government officials were interviewed by way of semi- structured interview. Finally, a comprehensive literature review, the result of Delphi technique questionnaire survey, and information of interviews were summed up as follows:
A. The content of policy-making on students’ loan for higher education students.
a. Confirming to the principle of social fairness and justice.
b. Offering the best method for cultivating national talents.
c. Avoiding resources concentrated in few people's hands so as to help every
stratum circulate.
d. Having the differentiation principle in fully implementing and realizing the equality of educational opportunity.
B. The process of policy-making students’ loan for higher education students.
a. Meeting the requirement of multiple participations and practicing the
step-by-step approaching.
b. During the process, it is full of hues of negotiation as well as compromise, and with rational reviewing.
c. It is fully communicated, and reached a social rational consensus.
C. The factors affecting of policy-making students’ loan for higher education students.
a. Factors that affected students’ loan from all sectors of community.
b. The policy-making of students’ loan was influenced by parties’ policies.
c. The policy-making of students’ loan was influenced by mass medias.
D. The target achievement of policy-making toward the students' loan for high education students.
a. On helping the disadvantaged students to study in the higher education
opportunities, the goal has achieved high-level target.
b. On investing on improving human capital and increasing employment opportunities, the goals have reached at medium-high level.
c. Under fairness, effectiveness, sustainability and ensuring the students' right to education have reached medium-high level.
Finally, according to the above mentioned conclusion, the concrete suggestions
were presented in order to provide for education administration, parents and students, future researchers, three aspects for their information.
|
|---|
