| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 法律學系 === 106 === Sharing economy platforms have experienced a meteoric global rise in recent years, and Uber is one of those Iconic enterprises. These kind of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs), which means the companies pairing passengers via mobile apps with drivers who provide riding services with their own car, can solve market failures main resulting from “information asymmetry”.
Therefore, governments should legalize the TNCs. In order not to stifle the innovation, governments should regulate TNCs with temporary legal framework, deregulate from Taxi rule since customer safety would be protected. Moreover, let the companies do the self-regulation themselves. These are learnt from the theories and regulating experiences in United States.
According to the above theory and experiences, the R.O.C. regulation should not ban TNCs, and its policy for Taxi diversity is still out of date. This thesis tried to exam the purpose of forbidden policy from angle of Constitution and jurisprudence, proving that purposing to protecting Taxi industry is not constitutional and rational. I also provide specific amendments to regulate the TNCs in R.O.C.
In the end, this thesis also offered proposals facilitating the transformation of Taxi industry for Taxi regulations.
|
|---|
