A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 法律學系 === 106 === Drug Courts that have risen from development in the United States have had a gradual influence on the rest of the world, and have even been amended into Taiwanese law. This has been an important issue in recent discussions of criminal policy. In order to understand...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/h83xes |
id |
ndltd-TW-106NCCU5194032 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-106NCCU51940322019-05-16T00:15:32Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/h83xes A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts 毒品法庭的批判性考察 Lin, Jun Ru 林俊儒 碩士 國立政治大學 法律學系 106 Drug Courts that have risen from development in the United States have had a gradual influence on the rest of the world, and have even been amended into Taiwanese law. This has been an important issue in recent discussions of criminal policy. In order to understand Drug Courts in detail, this article first introduces the background and the contents of the system, and then explores historical causes and reform dilemmas. It then analyzes the issue from the perspective of institutional structure and procedural legal principles. To then focus the issue back on Taiwan, on the basis of understanding the current state of practice through empirical data, a comparative study of the context of reform and institutional issues is conducted. Finally, this article will attempt to put forward a proposal for an evaluation from the perspective of criminal policy as a strategy for dealing with drug addicts in Taiwan. Within its jurisdiction, the Drug Court will avoid applying penalties to drug users, and instead adopt attitudes and methods that focus on meticulous and multi-faceted methods that promote participation in treatment. At the same time, they also punish or reward based on performance, carry out strict supervision aimed at strengthening requirements and treatment obligations, and deepen the contradiction between the identity of patients and prisoners among drug users. On the other hand, the transition of procedures to collaboration, case-director orientation, and problem solving is different from confrontation, case-orientation, and truth discovery. In this regard, it is important to reflect on the problems with the system and the choice of values of the criminal policy seen behind them. Hsieh, Ju Yuan 謝如媛 學位論文 ; thesis 166 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 法律學系 === 106 === Drug Courts that have risen from development in the United States have had a gradual influence on the rest of the world, and have even been amended into Taiwanese law. This has been an important issue in recent discussions of criminal policy. In order to understand Drug Courts in detail, this article first introduces the background and the contents of the system, and then explores historical causes and reform dilemmas. It then analyzes the issue from the perspective of institutional structure and procedural legal principles. To then focus the issue back on Taiwan, on the basis of understanding the current state of practice through empirical data, a comparative study of the context of reform and institutional issues is conducted. Finally, this article will attempt to put forward a proposal for an evaluation from the perspective of criminal policy as a strategy for dealing with drug addicts in Taiwan.
Within its jurisdiction, the Drug Court will avoid applying penalties to drug users, and instead adopt attitudes and methods that focus on meticulous and multi-faceted methods that promote participation in treatment. At the same time, they also punish or reward based on performance, carry out strict supervision aimed at strengthening requirements and treatment obligations, and deepen the contradiction between the identity of patients and prisoners among drug users. On the other hand, the transition of procedures to collaboration, case-director orientation, and problem solving is different from confrontation, case-orientation, and truth discovery. In this regard, it is important to reflect on the problems with the system and the choice of values of the criminal policy seen behind them.
|
author2 |
Hsieh, Ju Yuan |
author_facet |
Hsieh, Ju Yuan Lin, Jun Ru 林俊儒 |
author |
Lin, Jun Ru 林俊儒 |
spellingShingle |
Lin, Jun Ru 林俊儒 A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts |
author_sort |
Lin, Jun Ru |
title |
A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts |
title_short |
A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts |
title_full |
A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts |
title_fullStr |
A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts |
title_sort |
critical analysis of drug courts |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/h83xes |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linjunru acriticalanalysisofdrugcourts AT línjùnrú acriticalanalysisofdrugcourts AT linjunru dúpǐnfǎtíngdepīpànxìngkǎochá AT línjùnrú dúpǐnfǎtíngdepīpànxìngkǎochá AT linjunru criticalanalysisofdrugcourts AT línjùnrú criticalanalysisofdrugcourts |
_version_ |
1719162910814502912 |