Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process

碩士 === 中華大學 === 科技管理學系 === 106 === Weapon acquisition in our military is either through self-made or purchase overseas. No matter which way a new weapon is acquired, it must complete the evaluation phase before its service can begin. Through the evaluation phase, we could find out whether a weapon m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HSU,PAN-CHEN, 許邦晨
Other Authors: LEE,Amy H. I.
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/vg5xm5
id ndltd-TW-106CHPI0230102
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-106CHPI02301022019-05-16T00:44:35Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/vg5xm5 Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process 我國武獲流程戰機效益性測試評估之研究 HSU,PAN-CHEN 許邦晨 碩士 中華大學 科技管理學系 106 Weapon acquisition in our military is either through self-made or purchase overseas. No matter which way a new weapon is acquired, it must complete the evaluation phase before its service can begin. Through the evaluation phase, we could find out whether a weapon meets the field needs or the users’ needs. Without the operational evaluation, we may have wasted a lot of budget before finding out that the weapon does not fulfill our needs. This kind of waste could leave us a great distance behind from the advanced countries when we are already in a military budget contraction era. This research studies the operational effectiveness evaluation in weapon acquisition and uses the operational test and evaluation of fighter jets as an example. Through this research, we could meet the goal of building a small but tough military. Based on the questionnaires collected from experts, an analysis can be performed using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). In the hierarchy, there are four dimensions and 14 indicators. The four dimensions are: radar performance, flight performance, electronic warfare performance and weapon performance. Under the four dimensions, there are 14 indicators, such as detecting range. The results show that the radar performance is the most important among the four dimensions, with a priority of 47%. This means that the radar performance is what the analysts and test pilots most concerned about. Detecting range (25.5%), target locked ability (16.9%), effective strike range (16.6%), ability of weapon locking the target (10.1%) and jamming ability (10%) are the most important indicators. The results could provide a good reference for operational effectiveness evaluation test items under a limited time and fund setting, and such a test and evaluation process could be effective in practice. LEE,Amy H. I. 李欣怡 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 67 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中華大學 === 科技管理學系 === 106 === Weapon acquisition in our military is either through self-made or purchase overseas. No matter which way a new weapon is acquired, it must complete the evaluation phase before its service can begin. Through the evaluation phase, we could find out whether a weapon meets the field needs or the users’ needs. Without the operational evaluation, we may have wasted a lot of budget before finding out that the weapon does not fulfill our needs. This kind of waste could leave us a great distance behind from the advanced countries when we are already in a military budget contraction era. This research studies the operational effectiveness evaluation in weapon acquisition and uses the operational test and evaluation of fighter jets as an example. Through this research, we could meet the goal of building a small but tough military. Based on the questionnaires collected from experts, an analysis can be performed using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). In the hierarchy, there are four dimensions and 14 indicators. The four dimensions are: radar performance, flight performance, electronic warfare performance and weapon performance. Under the four dimensions, there are 14 indicators, such as detecting range. The results show that the radar performance is the most important among the four dimensions, with a priority of 47%. This means that the radar performance is what the analysts and test pilots most concerned about. Detecting range (25.5%), target locked ability (16.9%), effective strike range (16.6%), ability of weapon locking the target (10.1%) and jamming ability (10%) are the most important indicators. The results could provide a good reference for operational effectiveness evaluation test items under a limited time and fund setting, and such a test and evaluation process could be effective in practice.
author2 LEE,Amy H. I.
author_facet LEE,Amy H. I.
HSU,PAN-CHEN
許邦晨
author HSU,PAN-CHEN
許邦晨
spellingShingle HSU,PAN-CHEN
許邦晨
Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process
author_sort HSU,PAN-CHEN
title Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process
title_short Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process
title_full Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process
title_fullStr Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process
title_full_unstemmed Research of Fighter Plane Operational Effectiveness Evaluation in Weapon Acquisition Process
title_sort research of fighter plane operational effectiveness evaluation in weapon acquisition process
publishDate 2018
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/vg5xm5
work_keys_str_mv AT hsupanchen researchoffighterplaneoperationaleffectivenessevaluationinweaponacquisitionprocess
AT xǔbāngchén researchoffighterplaneoperationaleffectivenessevaluationinweaponacquisitionprocess
AT hsupanchen wǒguówǔhuòliúchéngzhànjīxiàoyìxìngcèshìpínggūzhīyánjiū
AT xǔbāngchén wǒguówǔhuòliúchéngzhànjīxiàoyìxìngcèshìpínggūzhīyánjiū
_version_ 1719169229322715136