Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北藝術大學 === 美術學系碩(博)士班 === 105 === Over the past two years, I have shifted to the field of film and television from being as a student of Fine Arts. The frequent accesses to various institutions and the abundant migration experience of various communities have been simultaneously conducted along with my intense experiences of creation (intensive production of film and TV scripts), thereby interactively identifying an urgent issue: how would the subjectivity avoid from losing its original appearance in the fields of cultural creation, social science and political science, as well as in the society and ideology of normal migration? For me, approaching different institutions is like a new “arrival,” arriving at another solid system that is already built with mechanisms and formulated jointly with similar values, which is relative to my constructive logics of story production—continuously conceive the new world view, interactions between roles, and the core theme. Through the intensive creative development, communication, adjustment and re-creation of the script production process, I have been brought with the dynamic construction experience of innovative evolution, as well as the realization of the dangerous situation of the existence of “I” during the increasing miscellany caused by different cultural creation fields. When I, as the author, have been transferred into the fictional world, how could the subjective consciousness of the author be recognized and built in stories with various types and themes? One is arriving at the already built system while another one has already built a new world. Nevertheless, both are the concept of migration, despite that the latter can visualize the differences between various systems in a particular fictional space and also has the potential to be excessively read and viewed. Thinking of the possibility that films can visualize the differences and connect with the dynamics at the same time, which forms a possible structure that is more consistent with the normal migration and also has the subject’s autonomy with variable nature in such a context, I, thereby, use the term of “Migratory Subjectivity.”
|