Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made

碩士 === 東吳大學 === 法律學系 === 105 === The word of “A duration effect of Administrative decision” (DA) is clearly acted in Article 128I (1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in our country. However, what does “The durative effect” means, and what does the different between “The durative effect” an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: WU, YU-CHEN, 吳語蓁
Other Authors: HONG, JIA-YIN
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9npmns
id ndltd-TW-105SCU00194011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105SCU001940112019-05-15T23:10:10Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9npmns Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made 論具持續效力行政處分作成時基礎狀態之事後變更 WU, YU-CHEN 吳語蓁 碩士 東吳大學 法律學系 105 The word of “A duration effect of Administrative decision” (DA) is clearly acted in Article 128I (1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in our country. However, what does “The durative effect” means, and what does the different between “The durative effect” and “The effect of Administrative decision”, it’s still a question. Based on the Theories and the Practice development of German and our country, this paper describes the meaning of “A durative effect”, and introduces the comparison with some confusing concepts. Furthermore, this paper tries to draft the image of author’s think about DA. After presenting a clarification of basic concepts, due to the duration of DA, the foundation status could change afterwards, in that time, the original legal situation may turn into illegal, what steps should the Administrative organ and the Court take is an important issue for researching. Because the concerns of administrative proceedings and judicial proceedings are difference, the discussion of Chapter III is divided into two parts. Moreover, Chapter IV&V distinguishes two kinds of the foundation status change, “Favorable change and “Adverse change” (FC, AC). The focus on FC is the discussion of Reopening of Administrative Proceedings, this section reviews the appropriateness of Article 128I (1) of APA. The focus on AC is the claim for returning unjustified enrichment in public law. The author considers whether the Administrative organ has this right, what is the proper returning range and how to takes the legal action. Chapter V also discusses the amendment of Article 127III of APA. Finally, writing a summary in Chapter VI. Hope the readers could understand the topic concept more clearly after reading this paper. HONG, JIA-YIN 洪家殷 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 122 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 東吳大學 === 法律學系 === 105 === The word of “A duration effect of Administrative decision” (DA) is clearly acted in Article 128I (1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in our country. However, what does “The durative effect” means, and what does the different between “The durative effect” and “The effect of Administrative decision”, it’s still a question. Based on the Theories and the Practice development of German and our country, this paper describes the meaning of “A durative effect”, and introduces the comparison with some confusing concepts. Furthermore, this paper tries to draft the image of author’s think about DA. After presenting a clarification of basic concepts, due to the duration of DA, the foundation status could change afterwards, in that time, the original legal situation may turn into illegal, what steps should the Administrative organ and the Court take is an important issue for researching. Because the concerns of administrative proceedings and judicial proceedings are difference, the discussion of Chapter III is divided into two parts. Moreover, Chapter IV&V distinguishes two kinds of the foundation status change, “Favorable change and “Adverse change” (FC, AC). The focus on FC is the discussion of Reopening of Administrative Proceedings, this section reviews the appropriateness of Article 128I (1) of APA. The focus on AC is the claim for returning unjustified enrichment in public law. The author considers whether the Administrative organ has this right, what is the proper returning range and how to takes the legal action. Chapter V also discusses the amendment of Article 127III of APA. Finally, writing a summary in Chapter VI. Hope the readers could understand the topic concept more clearly after reading this paper.
author2 HONG, JIA-YIN
author_facet HONG, JIA-YIN
WU, YU-CHEN
吳語蓁
author WU, YU-CHEN
吳語蓁
spellingShingle WU, YU-CHEN
吳語蓁
Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made
author_sort WU, YU-CHEN
title Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made
title_short Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made
title_full Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made
title_fullStr Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made
title_full_unstemmed Study on The Foundation Status of a Duration Effect of Administrative Decision changes after it was made
title_sort study on the foundation status of a duration effect of administrative decision changes after it was made
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9npmns
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyuchen studyonthefoundationstatusofadurationeffectofadministrativedecisionchangesafteritwasmade
AT wúyǔzhēn studyonthefoundationstatusofadurationeffectofadministrativedecisionchangesafteritwasmade
AT wuyuchen lùnjùchíxùxiàolìxíngzhèngchùfēnzuòchéngshíjīchǔzhuàngtàizhīshìhòubiàngèng
AT wúyǔzhēn lùnjùchíxùxiàolìxíngzhèngchùfēnzuòchéngshíjīchǔzhuàngtàizhīshìhòubiàngèng
_version_ 1719142896649633792