| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣海洋大學 === 海洋事務與資源管理研究所 === 105 === The rising tention in the East China Sea is mainly due to the fact that China, Japan and Taiwan have claimed their sovereignt right and jurisdiction of submarine resources. In addiontion to competing for the strategic location in the East China Sea, the concerned countries are seeking the benefits in politics and economy as well as the wealth of submarine and aquatic resources such as oil and mineral resources. There are three aspects that resulted in the dispute in the East China Sea. Firstly, oil and gas resources dispute. China, Taiwan, Japan are facing oil shortage and economic problems so that oil and gas are more and more important to them. Secondly, the East China Sea waters dispute. Taiwan, China and Japan have the overlap situation of theor exclusive econmic zones. Thus, disputes over the delimitation of EEZ in the East China Sea are relatively tense with the international situation. Thirdly, the response form the related countries, Taiwan, Japan and China that claim the sovereignty of the Diaoyutai Islands took active measures to protect their own sovereignty and maritime interests. Taiwan has promulgated its “Law on the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf of the Republic of China” and announced its baseline in the Diaoyutai Islands. Pursuant to the Law, Taiwan shall enjoy and exercise the sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving, and managing the resources, living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil as well as the jurisdiction over the construction, use, modification, or dismantlement of artificial islands, installations or structures. In principle, the resolution of international disputes can be addressed through the use of joint development and resource sharing. In this regard, based on the feasible method and the relative difficulty, this thesis explores the peace resolution in the East China Sea via the following four models：fishery development agreement, sovereign security cooperation, legal settlement of disputes, and shelved sovereign co-development.
|
|---|
