| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 社會工作學研究所 === 105 === In 2008, Taiwan Fund for Children and Families (CCF) has introduced a project named "Wraparound", which has been practiced in the United States of America for quite some time. The family in need will be joined by youth or parents/caregivers to work alongside the family. By using Strengths Perspective to inspire the positive
force in the family, also to connect and to integrate with local community resources as team services. The purpose is to bind the family, to remain and to spark the renovation for Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, so the service model can be flexible enough to adapt to specific cases.
This study aims to grasp the service experiences of the youth partners for the Wraparound Project. Their work includes：(the youth partners’)Training before
entering the particular family, collaboration with the particular family and team members, and the period of undergoing constant supervision from the members. They will also share their perspectives on Wraparound and offer suggestions on both practical and institutional sector. This nine study interviews are Wraparound youth partners from CCF for the pubic to have clearer insight on the current status of Wraparound in Taiwan.
The result of the study shows, after constant developments, Wraparound brings out three key factors, listed as follows：Family meetings, engaging parents/caregiver participants, and draw up service programs. These key points outlined Wraparound
and distinguishes it from other services.
Wraparound Project emphasizes on team collaboration in order to offer the most suitable arrangement for individual cases. Thus, during the service process, the youth partners were indeed working very closely with the members from Wraparound team. These collaboration experiences shape the vital element for youth participants. The nine interviewees have at least two years experiences in the field. There are certain
experiences and dilemma that were encountered during their services, all of them are unique examples. Furthermore, interviewees also provides suggestions regarding family meeting, supervision, training course, family companion, and other approach on administrative levels.
|
|---|
