The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act

碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 105 === The case of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act (TPPA) concerns a number of legal issues as to TPPA’s compatibility with the World Health Organization (WHO) Agreement on Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lu, Si-Wei, 盧思薇
Other Authors: Lin, Ching-Fu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g9n2s5
id ndltd-TW-105NTHU5705014
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105NTHU57050142019-05-15T23:53:46Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g9n2s5 The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 論跨國爭端解決機制之設計與選擇—以澳洲菸草素面包裝法爭端案件為核心 Lu, Si-Wei 盧思薇 碩士 國立清華大學 科技法律研究所 105 The case of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act (TPPA) concerns a number of legal issues as to TPPA’s compatibility with the World Health Organization (WHO) Agreement on Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), and Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Hong Kong for the Promotion and Protection of Investments. This case is of extraordinary importance under the international legal framework with respect to problems resulted from the proliferation of international dispute settlement mechanisms. Similarly, it sheds light on issues regarding the selection and design of international courts. The existing literature primarily focuses on forum shopping before domestic courts, leaving out an equally important, yet less explored issue—forming shopping before international dispute mechanisms. In this Article, the author therefore presents a design and selection theory of international dispute settlement mechanisms. Moreover, the author seeks to apply this theory to the case of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, discussing the costs and benefits of using international trade, international investment, international health, and domestic court’s dispute settlement mechanisms, and specifically analyzing each regime’s design flaws. With a focus on the relationship between the increased international tribunals and transnational disputes with legal tricky issues, this article proposes “a rational design and selection of dispute settlement mechanisms” approach as a possible solution for the unsettled issues under the international framework. Lin, Ching-Fu 林勤富 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 184 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 105 === The case of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act (TPPA) concerns a number of legal issues as to TPPA’s compatibility with the World Health Organization (WHO) Agreement on Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), and Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Hong Kong for the Promotion and Protection of Investments. This case is of extraordinary importance under the international legal framework with respect to problems resulted from the proliferation of international dispute settlement mechanisms. Similarly, it sheds light on issues regarding the selection and design of international courts. The existing literature primarily focuses on forum shopping before domestic courts, leaving out an equally important, yet less explored issue—forming shopping before international dispute mechanisms. In this Article, the author therefore presents a design and selection theory of international dispute settlement mechanisms. Moreover, the author seeks to apply this theory to the case of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, discussing the costs and benefits of using international trade, international investment, international health, and domestic court’s dispute settlement mechanisms, and specifically analyzing each regime’s design flaws. With a focus on the relationship between the increased international tribunals and transnational disputes with legal tricky issues, this article proposes “a rational design and selection of dispute settlement mechanisms” approach as a possible solution for the unsettled issues under the international framework.
author2 Lin, Ching-Fu
author_facet Lin, Ching-Fu
Lu, Si-Wei
盧思薇
author Lu, Si-Wei
盧思薇
spellingShingle Lu, Si-Wei
盧思薇
The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act
author_sort Lu, Si-Wei
title The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act
title_short The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act
title_full The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act
title_fullStr The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act
title_full_unstemmed The Design and Selection of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Case Study of Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act
title_sort design and selection of international dispute settlement mechanisms: a case study of australia’s tobacco plain packaging act
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/g9n2s5
work_keys_str_mv AT lusiwei thedesignandselectionofinternationaldisputesettlementmechanismsacasestudyofaustraliastobaccoplainpackagingact
AT lúsīwēi thedesignandselectionofinternationaldisputesettlementmechanismsacasestudyofaustraliastobaccoplainpackagingact
AT lusiwei lùnkuàguózhēngduānjiějuéjīzhìzhīshèjìyǔxuǎnzéyǐàozhōuyāncǎosùmiànbāozhuāngfǎzhēngduānànjiànwèihéxīn
AT lúsīwēi lùnkuàguózhēngduānjiějuéjīzhìzhīshèjìyǔxuǎnzéyǐàozhōuyāncǎosùmiànbāozhuāngfǎzhēngduānànjiànwèihéxīn
AT lusiwei designandselectionofinternationaldisputesettlementmechanismsacasestudyofaustraliastobaccoplainpackagingact
AT lúsīwēi designandselectionofinternationaldisputesettlementmechanismsacasestudyofaustraliastobaccoplainpackagingact
_version_ 1719158068322762752