On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 哲學研究所 === 105 === Many philosophers think that the chain of justification of belief ultimately terminates on what is called “the Given”. Nevertheless, Sellars strongly criticizes the alleged epistemic role played by this notion, which he regards as being mysterious in nature. Altho...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2017
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ta2685 |
id |
ndltd-TW-105NTHU5259003 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-105NTHU52590032019-05-16T00:00:22Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ta2685 On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" 論賽勒斯《經驗主義與心靈哲學》中的既與之迷思 Kuan, Ting-Yu 官庭伃 碩士 國立清華大學 哲學研究所 105 Many philosophers think that the chain of justification of belief ultimately terminates on what is called “the Given”. Nevertheless, Sellars strongly criticizes the alleged epistemic role played by this notion, which he regards as being mysterious in nature. Although there are different ways of appealing to the Given, according to Sellars, none of them succeeds. In this thesis, my main tasks are: (1) to examine Sellars’ notion of the myth of the Given and expose how he rejects it with different arguments; (2) to elucidate Sellars’ view of justification and how he tackles with the problem of infinite regress of justification; (3) to argue against the criticisms of Sellars from Snowdon, Alston and Brandom respectively. Chiu, Chi-Chun 趙之振 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 哲學研究所 === 105 === Many philosophers think that the chain of justification of belief ultimately terminates on what is called “the Given”. Nevertheless, Sellars strongly criticizes the alleged epistemic role played by this notion, which he regards as being mysterious in nature. Although there are different ways of appealing to the Given, according to Sellars, none of them succeeds. In this thesis, my main tasks are: (1) to examine Sellars’ notion of the myth of the Given and expose how he rejects it with different arguments; (2) to elucidate Sellars’ view of justification and how he tackles with the problem of infinite regress of justification; (3) to argue against the criticisms of Sellars from Snowdon, Alston and Brandom respectively.
|
author2 |
Chiu, Chi-Chun |
author_facet |
Chiu, Chi-Chun Kuan, Ting-Yu 官庭伃 |
author |
Kuan, Ting-Yu 官庭伃 |
spellingShingle |
Kuan, Ting-Yu 官庭伃 On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" |
author_sort |
Kuan, Ting-Yu |
title |
On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" |
title_short |
On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" |
title_full |
On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" |
title_fullStr |
On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" |
title_sort |
on the myth of the given in sellars’s "empiricism and the philosophy of mind" |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ta2685 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuantingyu onthemythofthegiveninsellarssempiricismandthephilosophyofmind AT guāntíngyú onthemythofthegiveninsellarssempiricismandthephilosophyofmind AT kuantingyu lùnsàilēisījīngyànzhǔyìyǔxīnlíngzhéxuézhōngdejìyǔzhīmísī AT guāntíngyú lùnsàilēisījīngyànzhǔyìyǔxīnlíngzhéxuézhōngdejìyǔzhīmísī |
_version_ |
1719157794665398272 |