On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"

碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 哲學研究所 === 105 === Many philosophers think that the chain of justification of belief ultimately terminates on what is called “the Given”. Nevertheless, Sellars strongly criticizes the alleged epistemic role played by this notion, which he regards as being mysterious in nature. Altho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuan, Ting-Yu, 官庭伃
Other Authors: Chiu, Chi-Chun
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ta2685
id ndltd-TW-105NTHU5259003
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105NTHU52590032019-05-16T00:00:22Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ta2685 On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" 論賽勒斯《經驗主義與心靈哲學》中的既與之迷思 Kuan, Ting-Yu 官庭伃 碩士 國立清華大學 哲學研究所 105 Many philosophers think that the chain of justification of belief ultimately terminates on what is called “the Given”. Nevertheless, Sellars strongly criticizes the alleged epistemic role played by this notion, which he regards as being mysterious in nature. Although there are different ways of appealing to the Given, according to Sellars, none of them succeeds. In this thesis, my main tasks are: (1) to examine Sellars’ notion of the myth of the Given and expose how he rejects it with different arguments; (2) to elucidate Sellars’ view of justification and how he tackles with the problem of infinite regress of justification; (3) to argue against the criticisms of Sellars from Snowdon, Alston and Brandom respectively. Chiu, Chi-Chun 趙之振 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 哲學研究所 === 105 === Many philosophers think that the chain of justification of belief ultimately terminates on what is called “the Given”. Nevertheless, Sellars strongly criticizes the alleged epistemic role played by this notion, which he regards as being mysterious in nature. Although there are different ways of appealing to the Given, according to Sellars, none of them succeeds. In this thesis, my main tasks are: (1) to examine Sellars’ notion of the myth of the Given and expose how he rejects it with different arguments; (2) to elucidate Sellars’ view of justification and how he tackles with the problem of infinite regress of justification; (3) to argue against the criticisms of Sellars from Snowdon, Alston and Brandom respectively.
author2 Chiu, Chi-Chun
author_facet Chiu, Chi-Chun
Kuan, Ting-Yu
官庭伃
author Kuan, Ting-Yu
官庭伃
spellingShingle Kuan, Ting-Yu
官庭伃
On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
author_sort Kuan, Ting-Yu
title On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
title_short On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
title_full On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
title_fullStr On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
title_full_unstemmed On the Myth of the Given in Sellars’s "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"
title_sort on the myth of the given in sellars’s "empiricism and the philosophy of mind"
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ta2685
work_keys_str_mv AT kuantingyu onthemythofthegiveninsellarssempiricismandthephilosophyofmind
AT guāntíngyú onthemythofthegiveninsellarssempiricismandthephilosophyofmind
AT kuantingyu lùnsàilēisījīngyànzhǔyìyǔxīnlíngzhéxuézhōngdejìyǔzhīmísī
AT guāntíngyú lùnsàilēisījīngyànzhǔyìyǔxīnlíngzhéxuézhōngdejìyǔzhīmísī
_version_ 1719157794665398272