The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task

碩士 === 國立屏東大學 === 資訊管理學系碩士班 === 105 === Past research on recommender systems mostly focused on improving the recommendation accuracy. Although accuracy is the key factor for the success of a recommender system, the accuracy alone is not enough to evaluate the practical utility of a recommender syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHUANG, CHENG-WEI, 莊証幃
Other Authors: HSIAO, WEN-FENG
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87z9n8
id ndltd-TW-105NPTU0396011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105NPTU03960112019-05-15T23:32:16Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87z9n8 The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task 傳統與結合LDA之協同過濾推薦法在多樣性、新穎性和相關性指標之比較 CHUANG, CHENG-WEI 莊証幃 碩士 國立屏東大學 資訊管理學系碩士班 105 Past research on recommender systems mostly focused on improving the recommendation accuracy. Although accuracy is the key factor for the success of a recommender system, the accuracy alone is not enough to evaluate the practical utility of a recommender system. Therefore, in recent years, many measures different from accuracy have been proposed, such as diversity, novelty, coverage, serendipity and unexpectedness to compensate the accuracy measure. In this paper, we used Apache Mahout to generate the collaborative filtering recommendation. We also employed the JGibbLDA tool to construct the LDA topic model to infer the topic probability distribution of the items or the users, and further by calculating the similarities to get the LDA based recommendation. In this paper we first filtered out the indicators for diversity and novelty that currently get many citations. We then compared the performance of the recommended methods on these indicators, and suggested the corresponding recommended methods for the users that can balance accuracy, diversity, and novelty, in order to increase users’ satisfaction.According to the experimental results of the film dataset, it is found that the cooperative filtering with LDA can obtain a high correlation, and the traditional cooperative filtering can obtain higher diversity. The project based CF and the LD based on the project can get more High novelty. The experimental results of the joke dataset found that the project-based CF was highly correlated with LDA-based synergistic filtering available for higher diversity, project-based CF and LDA-based CF-based CF can get a higher novelty. HSIAO, WEN-FENG 蕭文峰 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 47 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立屏東大學 === 資訊管理學系碩士班 === 105 === Past research on recommender systems mostly focused on improving the recommendation accuracy. Although accuracy is the key factor for the success of a recommender system, the accuracy alone is not enough to evaluate the practical utility of a recommender system. Therefore, in recent years, many measures different from accuracy have been proposed, such as diversity, novelty, coverage, serendipity and unexpectedness to compensate the accuracy measure. In this paper, we used Apache Mahout to generate the collaborative filtering recommendation. We also employed the JGibbLDA tool to construct the LDA topic model to infer the topic probability distribution of the items or the users, and further by calculating the similarities to get the LDA based recommendation. In this paper we first filtered out the indicators for diversity and novelty that currently get many citations. We then compared the performance of the recommended methods on these indicators, and suggested the corresponding recommended methods for the users that can balance accuracy, diversity, and novelty, in order to increase users’ satisfaction.According to the experimental results of the film dataset, it is found that the cooperative filtering with LDA can obtain a high correlation, and the traditional cooperative filtering can obtain higher diversity. The project based CF and the LD based on the project can get more High novelty. The experimental results of the joke dataset found that the project-based CF was highly correlated with LDA-based synergistic filtering available for higher diversity, project-based CF and LDA-based CF-based CF can get a higher novelty.
author2 HSIAO, WEN-FENG
author_facet HSIAO, WEN-FENG
CHUANG, CHENG-WEI
莊証幃
author CHUANG, CHENG-WEI
莊証幃
spellingShingle CHUANG, CHENG-WEI
莊証幃
The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task
author_sort CHUANG, CHENG-WEI
title The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task
title_short The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task
title_full The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task
title_fullStr The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Traditional Collaborative Filtering Methods and LDA-variant on Diversity, Novelty and Correlation for Recommendation Task
title_sort comparison of traditional collaborative filtering methods and lda-variant on diversity, novelty and correlation for recommendation task
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87z9n8
work_keys_str_mv AT chuangchengwei thecomparisonoftraditionalcollaborativefilteringmethodsandldavariantondiversitynoveltyandcorrelationforrecommendationtask
AT zhuāngzhèngwéi thecomparisonoftraditionalcollaborativefilteringmethodsandldavariantondiversitynoveltyandcorrelationforrecommendationtask
AT chuangchengwei chuántǒngyǔjiéhéldazhīxiétóngguòlǜtuījiànfǎzàiduōyàngxìngxīnyǐngxìnghéxiāngguānxìngzhǐbiāozhībǐjiào
AT zhuāngzhèngwéi chuántǒngyǔjiéhéldazhīxiétóngguòlǜtuījiànfǎzàiduōyàngxìngxīnyǐngxìnghéxiāngguānxìngzhǐbiāozhībǐjiào
AT chuangchengwei comparisonoftraditionalcollaborativefilteringmethodsandldavariantondiversitynoveltyandcorrelationforrecommendationtask
AT zhuāngzhèngwéi comparisonoftraditionalcollaborativefilteringmethodsandldavariantondiversitynoveltyandcorrelationforrecommendationtask
_version_ 1719148967795621888