Summary: | 碩士 === 南華大學 === 國際事務與企業學系公共政策研究碩士班 === 105 === On June 10, 2014, the State Council Information Office published the White Paper on the Practice of "One Country, Two Systems" in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Beijing officially announced its first comprehensive control over Hong Kong and made it clear that Hong Kong was adopted by the National People's Congress There is no so-called "surplus power" in the Special Administrative Region established by the Basic Law, that is, the power of the Central Authorities who have not granted or detained the exercise of the SAR. And the "Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong" in the White Paper still need to comply with the requirement that the Chief Executive must love the country. Since the resumption of sovereignty in Hong Kong in 1997, "one country, two systems" has been in the Special Administrative Region for 19 years and has gone through three special envoys. During the 19 years after the reunification of Hong Kong, Beijing provided assistance in times of crisis in the SAR economy. Together with the positive economic data of the SAR, the exchanges between China and Hong Kong were increasingly close. Various factors should allow Hong Kong people And is more familiar with and agree with the operation of the political system and the legal provisions of Beijing and the "one country, two systems" and the Basic Law. However, Beijing's announcement at this time that the White Paper has caused Hong Kong people's doubts about Beijing's doubts and policies and has created a political and social opposition in Hong Kong. This paper will understand the background meaning of "one country, two systems" for this "white paper" effect, and discuss the issue of surplus power in Hong Kong, the election of the chief executive and the "Hong Kong independence" issue.
|