The Evaluation on the Norm Establishment, Reliability &Validity of Gross Motor Developmental Scal in Peabody-2 amongst Children between the Ages of Four and Six

• Main Authors: Chen Shiu-Mei, 陳秀梅
• Other Authors: Dr. Yang, Shu-Chu
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/uvtj6k

博士 === 國立嘉義大學 === 教育學系研究所 === 105 === The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity The main purposes of this research were to determine the reliability and validity items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor items testing gross motor skills in the second edition of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMSScales (PDMSScales (PDMSScales (PDMSScales (PDMSScales (PDMS-2), to determine t2), to determine t2), to determine t2), to determine the developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst he developmental norm of gross motor skills amongst children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation children between the ages of four and six in Taoyuan area, to determine relation between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive between the participants’ background variables and their gross motor skills. Purposive sampling was used to recsampling was used to recsampling was used to recsampling was used to recsampling was used to recsampling was used to recsampling was used to recsampling was used to recruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, ruit a total of 265 participants at public and private kindergarten, 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool 138 boys and 127 girls. The reliability of the internal consistency research tool was .882, the testwas .882, the testwas .882, the testwas .882, the test-retest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the interretest reliability was .978, and the inter-rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The rater reliability was .960. The totatotal explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, l explained cumulative variance of the exploratory factor analysis was 71.472%, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, factor loading for stability skills was .854, the locomotor .844, and the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scaleand the factor loading for object control skills was .838, showing scale used in this used in this used in this used in this study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity.study has a good degree of reliability and validity. With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48With a percentile rank of 50, for the participants aged between 48-50 months, the raw 50 months, the raw 50 months, the raw 50 months, the raw 50 months, the raw 50 months, the raw scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263scores for gross motor skills were 263-275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51275; for the participants aged 51-53 months it was 53 months it was 53 months it was 53 months it was 53 months it was 271-283; for the participants aged 54the participants aged 54the participants aged 54the participants aged 54-59 months it was 27759 months it was 27759 months it was 27759 months it was 277-283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 283; for the participants aged 60-65 months it was 28065 months it was 28065 months it was 28065 months it was 280-285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66285; and for the participants aged 66-72 months it was 28272 months it was 28272 months it was 28272 months it was 282-286. With a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants sWith a percentile rank of 50, in stability skills and locomotor skills, the participants scored cored cored cored better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about better than their counterparts in the United States, and object control skills were about the same.the same. In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66In stability skills and object control skills, the participants aged 66-72 months performed 72 months performed 72 months performed 72 months performed 72 months performedbetter than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54better than the participants aged 54-59 months, 5159 months, 51-53 months and 4853 months and 4853 months and 48-50 months. In the 50 months. In the 50 months. In the 50 months. In the development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60development of gross motor skills, the participants aged 60-65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better 65 months performed better than the participants aged 54than the participants aged 54than the participants aged 54than the participants aged 54than the participants aged 54than the participants aged 54-59 months, 5159 months, 51-53 months and 4853 months and 4853 months and 48-50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability 50 months. In stability skills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participantskills and object control skills, the participants aged 60s aged 60-65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than 65 months performed better than the participants aged 51the participants aged 51the participants aged 51the participants aged 51the participants aged 51-53 months and the participants aged 4853 months and the participants aged 4853 months and the participants aged 4853 months and the participants aged 4853 months and the participants aged 4853 months and the participants aged 4853 months and the participants aged 48-50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, 50 months. As for gender, in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48in object control skills, the boys aged 48-53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in 53 months performed better than the girls in same age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in ssame age group. As for BMI, in stability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged tability skills, the participants with a normal BMI aged 51-53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but 53 months performed better than the overweight participants in same age group, but no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found.no other significant differences relating to BMI were found. Finally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suFinally, based on the results, I present some suggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and ggestions for future research and teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this agroup.teacheworking with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers working with this age group.teachers