A Study of the Relationship between a Coach’s Leadership Behavior, Relationship Quality and Training Effect that Junior-High-School Badminton Players Perceive

• Main Author: 陳建光
• Other Authors: Chang Chia-Ming
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/88078804271994823567

碩士 === 國立嘉義大學 === 體育與健康休閒學系研究所 === 105 === This study aims to understand the background variables between junior badminton players and the quality of their coaching leadership and training effect, to verify the relationship between junior badminton players and the quality of their coaching leadership and training effect. A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed to all 2014 National Junior Badminton championship participants. With a response rate of 77.5% of response rate, 310 samples were generated. The result of the data analysis shows that (1) there is no significant difference in group 1 – gender, grade, highest competition level, and years of playing and the role of their coaching leadership and variable trainings sessions. (2) There is no difference between group 2 – gender, grade, highest competition level, and years of playing and the role of their coaching leadership training. The players are more efficient when they attend 6 days per week of training than those attend 4-5 days of training per week. (3) There is no significant difference between group 3 – gender, grade, highest competition level, and years of playing and the role of their coaching leadership training. However, players attending 5 days of training per week scores lower than those attend 6 days of training per week. (4) There is a positive correlation between the players and their coaching leadership behavior where positive relationship and reward is implemented. (5) The coach’s democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, reward and caring system do not have a significant effect in players score. (6) Coaching relationship has a positive affect toward player’s training. (7) Relationship quality is part of an intervening variable in the three minor effects of the leadership and guidance of the coach to training effect. (8) The leadership and guidance of the coaching behavior, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, caring and rewarding system accounts for 70% of the coach-player relationship quality where 56% accounts for training results. Keywords: junior badminton players, coaches ' leadership behavior, coach-player relationship, player training