| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 公共行政與政策學系 === 105 === The rise and fall of a city is similar to the transformation of different generations; so is the change of policies, too. Urban renewal is for the purpose of continuation of a city's life, and judging from the experience of advanced countries such as the United States and Japan, whether an expansive urbanization policy which may lead to suburbanization and the downfall of the center of a city, or a revitalization policy to rescue a bubble economy, a city must advance and transform with the times if it does not want to become barren. A public policy will experience the phases of establishment, implementation and encounter of difficulties. If not to be terminated, it must continue changing with the times. In the early days, urban renewal of our country was mainly dominated by the public sector, but it was ineffective. In order to achieve the purpose of boosting the economy, it was listed as a major economic policy, and to speed up the promotion, the law was amended and the restrictions were relaxed to encourage the private sector to participate through incentive policies. However, as there are beneficiaries of the policy, there are victims. Excessively loosened regulatory restrictions eventually led to the occurrence of the Wenlin-Yuan incident.
The exploration of this article is divided into three parts: first, the current legal system in our country and its predicament; second, the applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework; third, the application of the theory to the Wenlin-Yuan urban renewal case for an analysis.
Research finds that the reason for the establishment of the Urban Renewal Ordinance is that it is regarded as a major national economic policy, which is different from the legislative purpose of Article 1 of the Ordinance of "promoting public interest", and it is easy for them to contradict each other in a single case. In addition, it is found from the Advocacy Coalition Framework that although the advocacy coalition is composed of members with similar beliefs, their divergent views when facing different issues are also the cause of the failure of the alliance.
Research recommends that in addition to referring to successful cases in other countries for the existing system, the critical success factor of urban renewal is that the government should have the attitude and role but does not act. The public sector should be able to unify the interpretation of public policies, and take human rights protection into public welfare consideration in order to make the urban renewal policy perfect.
|
|---|
