Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India

博士 === 國立中興大學 === 國際政治研究所 === 105 === The main objective of the work presented in this thesis was directed toward understanding why some insurgent movements remain unified and others falter and succumb to factionalism, intra-group fighting and fragmentation when facing state forces and other state s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Namrata Panwar, 包華
Other Authors: 陳牧民
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/68066203772903180768
id ndltd-TW-105NCHU5692027
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105NCHU56920272017-11-12T04:39:00Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/68066203772903180768 Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India 解釋叛軍團體的行為與發展軌跡─印度東北案例研究 Namrata Panwar 包華 博士 國立中興大學 國際政治研究所 105 The main objective of the work presented in this thesis was directed toward understanding why some insurgent movements remain unified and others falter and succumb to factionalism, intra-group fighting and fragmentation when facing state forces and other state strategies like peace accords/agreements, general amnesty, economic and political incentives. By drawing on the cases of India’s Northeast insurgencies—this study put forward the argument that the ability of the insurgent leadership to include various forms of social networks—core networks, peripheral networks and linking networks—is crucial in determining their fate against the government forces. The structure of social network upon which an insurgent organization builds its foundation determines its outward appearance and its ability to face external and internal challenges. The insurgent groups with access to all three forms of social networks are more enduring, resistant and internally cohesive than those who either lack such ties or deliberately cut off links with social networks. In this regard, the ability of the insurgent organizations to withstand external threat lies in how best the insurgent leaders take decisions and formulate strategies with respect to social networks in order to ensure elite cooperation and leadership hierarchy, and to enhance internal security in a militarily strong and politically accommodative state setting. This approach is tested with a study of 11 armed groups (and several unarmed groups) in three civil wars—Nagaland, Assam and Mizoram in India. Due to shared military and political environment and structural contexts, there is a drastic variation in and across each case of insurgency. Primary and secondary resources were used to trace out variations and similarities in their internal behavior and outward appearance. The case studies reveal strong support for the approach. 陳牧民 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 185 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立中興大學 === 國際政治研究所 === 105 === The main objective of the work presented in this thesis was directed toward understanding why some insurgent movements remain unified and others falter and succumb to factionalism, intra-group fighting and fragmentation when facing state forces and other state strategies like peace accords/agreements, general amnesty, economic and political incentives. By drawing on the cases of India’s Northeast insurgencies—this study put forward the argument that the ability of the insurgent leadership to include various forms of social networks—core networks, peripheral networks and linking networks—is crucial in determining their fate against the government forces. The structure of social network upon which an insurgent organization builds its foundation determines its outward appearance and its ability to face external and internal challenges. The insurgent groups with access to all three forms of social networks are more enduring, resistant and internally cohesive than those who either lack such ties or deliberately cut off links with social networks. In this regard, the ability of the insurgent organizations to withstand external threat lies in how best the insurgent leaders take decisions and formulate strategies with respect to social networks in order to ensure elite cooperation and leadership hierarchy, and to enhance internal security in a militarily strong and politically accommodative state setting. This approach is tested with a study of 11 armed groups (and several unarmed groups) in three civil wars—Nagaland, Assam and Mizoram in India. Due to shared military and political environment and structural contexts, there is a drastic variation in and across each case of insurgency. Primary and secondary resources were used to trace out variations and similarities in their internal behavior and outward appearance. The case studies reveal strong support for the approach.
author2 陳牧民
author_facet 陳牧民
Namrata Panwar
包華
author Namrata Panwar
包華
spellingShingle Namrata Panwar
包華
Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India
author_sort Namrata Panwar
title Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India
title_short Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India
title_full Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India
title_fullStr Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India
title_full_unstemmed Explaining Variations in Insurgent Group’s Behaviour and Trajectories: The Case Study of Northeast India
title_sort explaining variations in insurgent group’s behaviour and trajectories: the case study of northeast india
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/68066203772903180768
work_keys_str_mv AT namratapanwar explainingvariationsininsurgentgroupsbehaviourandtrajectoriesthecasestudyofnortheastindia
AT bāohuá explainingvariationsininsurgentgroupsbehaviourandtrajectoriesthecasestudyofnortheastindia
AT namratapanwar jiěshìpànjūntuántǐdexíngwèiyǔfāzhǎnguǐjīyìndùdōngběiànlìyánjiū
AT bāohuá jiěshìpànjūntuántǐdexíngwèiyǔfāzhǎnguǐjīyìndùdōngběiànlìyánjiū
_version_ 1718561686035628032