Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 學校行政碩士在職專班 === 105 === Abstract
In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted to explore the relationship among the positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management in high school teachers of Taipei City and New Taipei City. 650 samples were sent and 491 samples were collected. The recovery rate was 75.54%. There was a total of 461 valid questionnaires and a valid response rate of 71%. First, using the average, standard deviation and etc. to describe the current status of positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management in high schools of Taipei City and New Taipei City; second, use t-test and One-Way ANOVA to examine the perceptual response differences among positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management in the high schools of the two cities with background variables; then, use Pearson product difference to review the correlations; last, with multiple stepwise regression analysis to test the predictability of positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management. Finally, the study results will make recommendations for future reference.
I. The current perceptual situation of positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management in high schools is in good condition.
II. Different background variables are found in positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management
III. The positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management show a positive correlation
IV. The positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers and school innovation management have a predictive effect, the level of “sharing teaching practice” has the highest predictability.
1. A level of four variables in school innovation management “Administrative Management Innovation” has reached a predictability of 65.5%.
2. A level of four variables in school innovation management “Curriculum Instruction Innovation” has reached a predictability of 67.3%.
3. A level of three variables in school innovation management “Student Activities Innovation” has reached a predictability of 64.7%.
4. A level of five variables in school innovation management “Resource Utilization Innovation” has reached a predictability of 68.1%.
5. A level of four variables in school innovation management “Campus Environment Innovation” has reached a predictability of 62.1%.
6. A total of five variables in school innovation management has reached a predictability of 80%.
According to research study, it is hoped that the findings of this study can lead to substantial suggestions for the reference of educational administration, school administrative unit, high school personnel and further studies.
Keywords: positive leadership of principals, professional learning community of teachers, school innovation management
|