The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 哲學系 === 105 === This thesis is a historical retrospection on the philosophy of subjectivity. We commence our task with a review of the famous Cartesian “Cogito” – the substance of reflexive consciousness. Secondly, we refer to J. Lacan’s psychanalytical elaboration of “Desire.” Thi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/cc4ejv |
id |
ndltd-TW-105NCCU5259007 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-105NCCU52590072019-05-15T23:39:16Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/cc4ejv The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality 從個殊性與身體性論主體意涵 郭思妤 碩士 國立政治大學 哲學系 105 This thesis is a historical retrospection on the philosophy of subjectivity. We commence our task with a review of the famous Cartesian “Cogito” – the substance of reflexive consciousness. Secondly, we refer to J. Lacan’s psychanalytical elaboration of “Desire.” Thirdly, we make an allusion to E. Husserl’s phenomenological “Intersubjectivity,” with which Husserl seems to have surmounted the aporia of solipsism, yet, de facto, rendered it to be a unitary and transcendental structure of consciousness. Sequentially, we follow the hints that E. Levinas pointed, that the relation to others is the experience that subject lose its power. By this investigation, we hope to illustrate a “Self” not confined in an enclosing subject and thus to invite ourselves to reconsider how a subject can exist differently from a substance. 蔡錚雲 楊婉儀 學位論文 ; thesis 65 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 哲學系 === 105 === This thesis is a historical retrospection on the philosophy of subjectivity. We commence our task with a review of the famous Cartesian “Cogito” – the substance of reflexive consciousness. Secondly, we refer to J. Lacan’s psychanalytical elaboration of “Desire.” Thirdly, we make an allusion to E. Husserl’s phenomenological “Intersubjectivity,” with which Husserl seems to have surmounted the aporia of solipsism, yet, de facto, rendered it to be a unitary and transcendental structure of consciousness. Sequentially, we follow the hints that E. Levinas pointed, that the relation to others is the experience that subject lose its power. By this investigation, we hope to illustrate a “Self” not confined in an enclosing subject and thus to invite ourselves to reconsider how a subject can exist differently from a substance.
|
author2 |
蔡錚雲 |
author_facet |
蔡錚雲 郭思妤 |
author |
郭思妤 |
spellingShingle |
郭思妤 The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality |
author_sort |
郭思妤 |
title |
The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality |
title_short |
The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality |
title_full |
The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality |
title_fullStr |
The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Implication of Subject : A Vision from Individuality and Corporeality |
title_sort |
implication of subject : a vision from individuality and corporeality |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/cc4ejv |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guōsīyú theimplicationofsubjectavisionfromindividualityandcorporeality AT guōsīyú cónggèshūxìngyǔshēntǐxìnglùnzhǔtǐyìhán AT guōsīyú implicationofsubjectavisionfromindividualityandcorporeality |
_version_ |
1719150916929585152 |