A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology
博士 === 國立政治大學 === 國家發展研究所 === 105 === The human dignity of the unborn child remains uncertain in public policy domain. The importance of rethinking public reasonableness becomes unavoidable in the stage of late capitalism and liberal democracy. Political power, knowledge, and participation are three...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2017
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/j43p2e |
id |
ndltd-TW-105NCCU0011001 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-105NCCU00110012019-06-27T05:27:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/j43p2e A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology 以醫療社會學脈絡比較台灣與新加坡未出生胎兒的生命尊嚴 Shiao, Whei Ing 蕭慧瑛 博士 國立政治大學 國家發展研究所 105 The human dignity of the unborn child remains uncertain in public policy domain. The importance of rethinking public reasonableness becomes unavoidable in the stage of late capitalism and liberal democracy. Political power, knowledge, and participation are three key elements of policymaking. The human dignity of the unborn child is neglected in the process of policymaking of population politics. There are advocators, United Nations, United States, eugenicists, neo-Malthusians and International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) in the process of population policymaking at the international level during the past three decades. This research first attempts to focus on the inter relationship among these five advocators and to review how the unborn child becomes missing within the process of international population policymaking. Secondly, Taiwan and Singapore are two test cases to reveal the policy follower roles who adopt the similar dream of modern states. Thirdly, since the personal religious beliefs play a significant role not only in shaping attitudes, but also in economic development, political stability, sexual morality and gender equality. This research adopts qualitative approach the focus group interview to compare the attitude of human dignity of the unborn child between the faith-based people with non-faith people both in Taiwan and Singapore. In this research 24 focus groups will be organized across Taiwan and Singapore, each country contains 12 groups. Each country contains 6 faith-based focus groups and 6 non-faith focus groups. Attempt to find the difference and similarity of population policy between Taiwan and Singapore and to explore how the religious values and the concept of human dignity of the unborn child excluded in the process of demographic policymaking. Kao, Yuang Kuang 高永光 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 254 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
博士 === 國立政治大學 === 國家發展研究所 === 105 === The human dignity of the unborn child remains uncertain in public policy domain. The importance of rethinking public reasonableness becomes unavoidable in the stage of late capitalism and liberal democracy. Political power, knowledge, and participation are three key elements of policymaking. The human dignity of the unborn child is neglected in the process of policymaking of population politics. There are advocators, United Nations, United States, eugenicists, neo-Malthusians and International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) in the process of population policymaking at the international level during the past three decades. This research first attempts to focus on the inter relationship among these five advocators and to review how the unborn child becomes missing within the process of international population policymaking. Secondly, Taiwan and Singapore are two test cases to reveal the policy follower roles who adopt the similar dream of modern states. Thirdly, since the personal religious beliefs play a significant role not only in shaping attitudes, but also in economic development, political stability, sexual morality and gender equality. This research adopts qualitative approach the focus group interview to compare the attitude of human dignity of the unborn child between the faith-based people with non-faith people both in Taiwan and Singapore. In this research 24 focus groups will be organized across Taiwan and Singapore, each country contains 12 groups. Each country contains 6 faith-based focus groups and 6 non-faith focus groups. Attempt to find the difference and similarity of population policy between Taiwan and Singapore and to explore how the religious values and the concept of human dignity of the unborn child excluded in the process of demographic policymaking.
|
author2 |
Kao, Yuang Kuang |
author_facet |
Kao, Yuang Kuang Shiao, Whei Ing 蕭慧瑛 |
author |
Shiao, Whei Ing 蕭慧瑛 |
spellingShingle |
Shiao, Whei Ing 蕭慧瑛 A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology |
author_sort |
Shiao, Whei Ing |
title |
A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology |
title_short |
A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology |
title_full |
A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology |
title_fullStr |
A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Study on Human Dignity of the Unborn Child between Taiwan and Singapore in a context of Medical Sociology |
title_sort |
comparative study on human dignity of the unborn child between taiwan and singapore in a context of medical sociology |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/j43p2e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shiaowheiing acomparativestudyonhumandignityoftheunbornchildbetweentaiwanandsingaporeinacontextofmedicalsociology AT xiāohuìyīng acomparativestudyonhumandignityoftheunbornchildbetweentaiwanandsingaporeinacontextofmedicalsociology AT shiaowheiing yǐyīliáoshèhuìxuémàiluòbǐjiàotáiwānyǔxīnjiāpōwèichūshēngtāiérdeshēngmìngzūnyán AT xiāohuìyīng yǐyīliáoshèhuìxuémàiluòbǐjiàotáiwānyǔxīnjiāpōwèichūshēngtāiérdeshēngmìngzūnyán AT shiaowheiing comparativestudyonhumandignityoftheunbornchildbetweentaiwanandsingaporeinacontextofmedicalsociology AT xiāohuìyīng comparativestudyonhumandignityoftheunbornchildbetweentaiwanandsingaporeinacontextofmedicalsociology |
_version_ |
1719211635048972288 |