A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 哲學系 === 105 === In this Thesis, we are going to compare the three different traditions, ranging from Laozi, Philo of Alexandria and John Gospel, with Philo as the connector between Laotzu and John. So the main concept that we are going to discuss are Tao and Logos. Tao and Logos have...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norberthus Nuho Tukan, 盧兆明
Other Authors: Yu, Huang Chieh
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20239758938732786113
id ndltd-TW-105FJU00259007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-105FJU002590072017-06-24T04:45:52Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20239758938732786113 A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue 斐羅的道舆若望福音中耶稣與老子道的比較 Norberthus Nuho Tukan 盧兆明 碩士 輔仁大學 哲學系 105 In this Thesis, we are going to compare the three different traditions, ranging from Laozi, Philo of Alexandria and John Gospel, with Philo as the connector between Laotzu and John. So the main concept that we are going to discuss are Tao and Logos. Tao and Logos have a twofold functions: Cosmological and Anagogical functions. Our efforts to compare their concepts based on these two functions. In the first part: our focus is more to Cosmological function, as will be presented in chapter II and III. In the second part: our focus is more to anagogical functions, as will be presented in chapter IV. Based on these two functions: we will see the the Similarities and differences of their concepts. Yu, Huang Chieh 尤煌傑 2017 學位論文 ; thesis 84 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 哲學系 === 105 === In this Thesis, we are going to compare the three different traditions, ranging from Laozi, Philo of Alexandria and John Gospel, with Philo as the connector between Laotzu and John. So the main concept that we are going to discuss are Tao and Logos. Tao and Logos have a twofold functions: Cosmological and Anagogical functions. Our efforts to compare their concepts based on these two functions. In the first part: our focus is more to Cosmological function, as will be presented in chapter II and III. In the second part: our focus is more to anagogical functions, as will be presented in chapter IV. Based on these two functions: we will see the the Similarities and differences of their concepts.
author2 Yu, Huang Chieh
author_facet Yu, Huang Chieh
Norberthus Nuho Tukan
盧兆明
author Norberthus Nuho Tukan
盧兆明
spellingShingle Norberthus Nuho Tukan
盧兆明
A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
author_sort Norberthus Nuho Tukan
title A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
title_short A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
title_full A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
title_fullStr A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
title_sort comparison between laozi's tao, philo's logis and jesus in john's prologue
publishDate 2017
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20239758938732786113
work_keys_str_mv AT norberthusnuhotukan acomparisonbetweenlaozistaophiloslogisandjesusinjohnsprologue
AT lúzhàomíng acomparisonbetweenlaozistaophiloslogisandjesusinjohnsprologue
AT norberthusnuhotukan fěiluódedàoyúruòwàngfúyīnzhōngyésūyǔlǎozidàodebǐjiào
AT lúzhàomíng fěiluódedàoyúruòwàngfúyīnzhōngyésūyǔlǎozidàodebǐjiào
AT norberthusnuhotukan comparisonbetweenlaozistaophiloslogisandjesusinjohnsprologue
AT lúzhàomíng comparisonbetweenlaozistaophiloslogisandjesusinjohnsprologue
_version_ 1718463290907033600