A Comparison Between Laozi's Tao, Philo's Logis And Jesus in John's Prologue
碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 哲學系 === 105 === In this Thesis, we are going to compare the three different traditions, ranging from Laozi, Philo of Alexandria and John Gospel, with Philo as the connector between Laotzu and John. So the main concept that we are going to discuss are Tao and Logos. Tao and Logos have...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20239758938732786113 |
| Summary: | 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 哲學系 === 105 === In this Thesis, we are going to compare the three different traditions, ranging from Laozi, Philo of Alexandria and John Gospel, with Philo as the connector between Laotzu and John.
So the main concept that we are going to discuss are Tao and Logos.
Tao and Logos have a twofold functions: Cosmological and Anagogical functions. Our efforts to compare their concepts based on these two functions.
In the first part: our focus is more to Cosmological function, as will be presented in chapter II and III.
In the second part: our focus is more to anagogical functions, as will be presented in chapter IV.
Based on these two functions: we will see the the Similarities and differences of their concepts.
|
|---|