Construct the Decision Factors of Transformation of Traditional Stamping Industry Using FAHP

• Main Authors: CHEN, CHI-YUAN, 陳啟源
• Other Authors: CHEN, WEN-CHIN
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2017
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43544366736482523329

碩士 === 中華大學 === 工業管理學系 === 105 === It is well known that small and medium-sized enterprises are the main body of Taiwan's industry. From the OEM, ODM, innovation of R & D to its own brand name, it has made great contributions to Taiwan's economic growth. The stamping industry is typical of Taiwan's metal processing manufacturing "OEM", whose scope is small and lack of manpower for R & D professional. The face of globalization resulting in competition of high quality, low cost and short delivery, and the rising of China's red supply chain has influenced the living space of traditional stamping industry due to the shrinkage. Therefore, this study, in view of the current operating difficulties of the traditional stamping industry in Taiwan, puts forward to constructing a set of Multi-criteria decision making analysis (MCDA) model for the upgrading and transformation of stamping industry with a practical demand. First of all, through the relevant literature survey, strategic analysis and industrial upgrading transformation professional in-depth interviews, summed up the stamping industry upgrade transformation of the five objectives and its key impacts of the 18 criteria. Through the cmparisons of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), the most effective hierarchical structure of transformation of the stamping plants can be come up with according to the most appropriate priority weight. The results show that the first place of objectives is O5- transformation of management operational physique (accounted for 45.42% and 45.37%, respectively) using the AHP and FAHP methodologies, and the AHP and FAHP both prefer the second place for O3- the transformation of the original products (accounted for 18.79% and 18.81%, respectively). Besides, for the comparison of criteria, AHP and FAHP found that C18 (innovation and capability enhancement of R&D) is the first place (accounted for 20.20% and 20.12%, respectively).