| Summary: | 碩士 === 中華科技大學 === 建築工程與環境設計研究所在職專班 === 105 === Abstract
Urban renewal regulations have been implemented since 1998, and the effect is not significant. Although there are hundreds of approved implementation plans, effects of urban renewal promotions are limited. Urban renewal is divided into two categories, government sponsored and private sponsored. In the cases of private sponsored urban renewal, lots of time are wasted and even ended in a deadlock due to the conflicts between stakeholders. Current urban renewal regulations and enforcement rules of each district are voted according to the majority rule; given the concern of profiting contractors and landowners, upper limit of the highest rewards was set, but the possibilities of urban renewal are also being blocked. Hence, this essay researched on the related parties of private sponsored urban renewal – landowners, contractors, and the government, who oversees the examination and verification of rewards. Survey techniques were conducted in this study. Taking the urban renewal case in Lanya Section, Shilin District, Taipei City as example, this study conduct different contrast and analysis on the common requirements of three or both parties through interactions among related parties. The greatest common divisor is calculated for the different data as a foundation to evaluate and revise current regulations and rules. The results indicate that about 60% of citizens sold their property, and the keys to promote urban renewal are allowing property reciprocity tax exemption, proposition of value-added tax decreased by 10%, and that imputation system needed to be slashed. The results can provide legislative units and public department with a foundation to amend laws and to formulate and implement policies.
Keywords: private sponsored urban renewal, stakeholders, conflict solving, Survey techniques
|
|---|
