| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 勞工關係學系碩士在職專班 === 105 === The study examines "labor working environment monitoring implementation" Article10-2 by professional core competencies and the role of the industrial hygiene practice commission should have the technicians. It is also important the plight of the working environment monitoring program implementation and the total number of books to clarify five hundred people with chemical hazards and special harm to health operations of one hundred of the public institutions, and the suitability of industrial and mining health technicians to participate in the assessment team.
Literature analysis and interviews were used in this study. Interviews were sampled and classified as industrial level: interviewed by the number of employees and qualifications of the institution; the interest group level: interview with the technician office of the case; government level: inspector of the inspection agency interviews; scholar expert level: professors of university in the occupational safety and health professional experts. The total interviewee is ten persons.
This study analyzed through collected the operation multiple methods of data collections, the polymerization of the following four important research concludes that:(a)a practicing industrial hygiene technician jobs environmental monitoring Assessment Panel members have the condition qualifications and core competencies: should focus on the combined with practical experience and statistical data analysis and management capacity should be strengthened capacity in the core competence should be the background of industry analysis, and knowledge of toxicology and biology;(b)entrusted in practice of industrial hygiene technician job monitoring and evaluation role group orientation: make up any shortfall in-plant occupational safety and personnel expertise block for consultants, counseling and the role of impartial third party intervention, but has not yet been given industrial hygiene technician visa substantive tasks and responsibilities;(c)job practical problems of environmental monitoring plans book on planning and implementation faced: First, inter-departmental communication and coordination of difficulty. Second, monitoring plan formulation and implementation of technical difficulties in the face of the field problem. Third, monitoring project information management. Fourth, the plight of policy orientation; (d) the practitioner commissioned industrial hygiene technicians involved in the adequacy of the members of the panel which based on the total number of business units, a number of chemical hazards and special health hazards job to define whether forced by a certified industrial hygiene technician. The legislative basis of participation in the co-signatures and the evaluation of monitoring panels are not very appropriate. According to the finding of study, we make forward four research proposals as a reference:(a)construction of a professional core functions;(b)to give a clear positioningas a third party impartial role in mining hygienists;(c) the effective implementation and operation of the plight in environmental monitoring plan;(d)the consideration of revised the setting numbers.
|
|---|
