| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 104 === As networks developed, information transmission era, now teenagers, girls get a lot of information through the Internet, friends, status, and knowledge of the needs of many users of the material on the web anonymity allows users to speak their minds, a so-called said words to really fake people, fake people say that really the case, then, however, such a trend is the use of vulnerable people who are interested, the opportunity for the immature boy, girl trick, solicitation transactions, what they want, but now our criminal law for people under 16 years of age to have sex, there are penalties, and our Child and Youth sexual transaction Prevention Act provides for persons 18 years of age over 16 years younger than the sex trade who also penalties the responsibility, that is, if adults and people under 18 years of age in the sex trade, will be subjected to national sanctions law, this rule of law, people under 18 years of age with others in the sex trade by key called victims, but such was the victim of liberty puts the national deprivation, and even the more serious suspects come, eventually leading to such victims own label tied with deviant behavior of juveniles, highlights of liberty for more security of criminal defendants, while for non-criminal the defendant was absurd exclusive liberty of serious deprivation.
This article will first describe the current status resettlement measures being discussed by the regulations " emergency accommodation " normative content and operation of the qualitative nature of the emergency resettlement behavior why , in order to clarify its argument ; complex by the international conventions, Article VIII of the Constitution and Justice meeting to explain the relevant the reduced limit personal freedom and expansion of the scope of the judge depth reservations . Another Research on the Child and Youth Sexual Transaction Prevention Act set the historical background and evolution , in order to understand the change of the Act , as well as after the Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act purposes of administrative and judicial authority how it works , proposed amendments to the law to protect non-criminal defendants personal freedom , in order to solve problems occurred today and which may occur in the future.
|
|---|
