Force Reduction Simulation and Lower Extremity Exercise Performance between Different Wooden Surfaces

碩士 === 臺北市立大學 === 運動器材科技研究所 === 104 === Purposes: Study of the physical effects of wooden structures were compared with finite element analysis (FEA) , Berlin Artificial Athlete (BAA) and counter-movement jump (CMJ) . Methods: The study included two methods, one was simulated and verified, the other...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jhu, Siang-Yang, 朱翔揚
Other Authors: Chen, Yi-Cheng
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/35492440820527035440
Description
Summary:碩士 === 臺北市立大學 === 運動器材科技研究所 === 104 === Purposes: Study of the physical effects of wooden structures were compared with finite element analysis (FEA) , Berlin Artificial Athlete (BAA) and counter-movement jump (CMJ) . Methods: The study included two methods, one was simulated and verified, the others was functional testing. 18 wooden structures that overall dimensions are 0.9*0.6 m, had been tested using BAA that accords EN 14908:2005. FEA method also simulated with same wooden structures. 12 participants acted vertical CMJ on 18 wooden structures sequentially. The kinematics, includes knee and ankle joint angles, and kinetics includes ground reaction force, electromyography of lower-limb, were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Results: There had higher correlation (r = .964) between BAA and FEA. Kinematics and electromyography of lower-limb were no significant, but ground reaction force reached significant .Conclusions: FEA and BAA and kinetics can be used to evaluate peak ground vertical force, and EMG of lower-limb when landing on different wooden structures.