| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北藝術大學 === 藝術與人文教育研究所 === 104 === To be able to clearly understand the state of Arts and Humanities Learning in the field of the implementation of the evaluation criteria of their learning achievement. This study intends to performing art as an example, and based on the questionnaire survey invited seed teachers in the junior high school arts and humanities learning field performing art learning achievement assessment standard (divided into: investigation and exploration and performance, aesthetics and understanding, practice and application of, and, by way of interview, as an auxiliary. The purpose of this study include: 1. Understanding of junior high school students in Arts and humanities learning field performing art learning achievement evaluation effectiveness of the standards, 2. To investigate junior high school students in Arts and humanities learning field performing art learning achievement evaluation of the applicability of the standard. According to the learning achievement assessment standard art performance assessment implementation situation are proposed.
The results of the study showed that questionnaire part, the average before the highest number is before the practice and application of art , exploration and expression of expression and creation, and the average of the lowest for life to be applied to the practice and application of 1, aesthetics and understanding the value, to explore and show the multiple abilities. Interview part. In the traditional evaluation and nine years consistently rated quantity difference, the original score is difficult to specify, the previous evaluation system is subjective and easy operation, but the difference between the two is the most important or objective and clear theme and standard, so that everyone will be relatively easy to follow. 2. Review content using the view, the narrative method of the method is a good approach, because it has been very clear, do not need to change pattern of dichotomy, or to format the, because with the narrative method is to let every teacher in the context of this standard, can have their children into effect, so is respect for teachers, but also to let the students have more development space. 3. The evaluation mode for twelve years education expectation or suggestion, hope can be more precise said statements, simple clear and reasonable is a principle, it is relatively difficult to do formative and summative part, current rating system does not need to make substantial changes, just slightly adjust.Practical suggestions include: 1. For twelve years the country to promote teaching, the competent authority should be widely consult teachers and members of the revised. 2. Can expand to handle the teachers'' learning activities, teachers should timely enrich itself, 4. Performing art teachers cultivate training institutions with strong teaching curriculum evaluation. 5. The Ministry of education proposed erecting arts and humanities teaching assessment exclusive website, 6. Suggestions for the government related units will be arts and humanities curriculum practical segmentation. 7. In daily teaching into assessment standards and norms.
|
|---|
