The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety

碩士 === 東吳大學 === 法律學系 === 104 === While dealing with the issues of food safety under our criminal justice system, actus reus contains dangerous crime in both the Criminal Code and affiliated criminal laws of the Act Governing Food (Safety) and Sanitation (“the Act”). In theory, dangerous crime shall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SUNG, FENG-CHUN, 宋豐浚
Other Authors: HSU, YU-AN
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/admk7h
id ndltd-TW-104SCU00194026
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104SCU001940262019-05-15T22:34:18Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/admk7h The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety 危險犯之研究—以食品安全之刑法規範為中心 SUNG, FENG-CHUN 宋豐浚 碩士 東吳大學 法律學系 104 While dealing with the issues of food safety under our criminal justice system, actus reus contains dangerous crime in both the Criminal Code and affiliated criminal laws of the Act Governing Food (Safety) and Sanitation (“the Act”). In theory, dangerous crime shall be an exception since it simplifies liability of crime to achieve the purpose of protecting legal interests in an early stage. However, since late 20th century, abstract dangerous crime increases rapidly and heavily in the area of affiliated criminal laws of environmental law, economical law, etc. To the legislation tendency above including early-stage and severe criminal liability, scholars call “Risk Criminal Law” to describe the phenomenon of modern criminal law, high abstraction of protected legal interests, as well as symbolization of criminal law. Meanwhile, this trend reflects on legal amendments of affiliated criminal laws of the Act since the plasticizer crisis broke out. The plasticizer crisis in 2011 became one of the most significant events in food safety history in Taiwan, it not only recalled awareness of food safety, but also impelled a series of legal amendments. However, legislators imputed the crisis to light penalty and liability and never try to review and the whole Act. This treatment although can calm public uneasy mood, such actions are palliatives. Predictably, while ability of illegal discovery of the authority does not catch up, a part of the owners of the food industries would rather take their chance in order to cost down and earn profit. As expected, after the poisoned starch crisis breaking out in May 2013, legislators realized the importance of precaution against food safety issues. Nonetheless, they never give up aggravating penalty and liability as their main sanction. Meanwhile, the Act attributed specific behavior such as “manufacturing or selling food that have been adulterated or counterfeited” or “containing food additives that are not approved by the central competent authority” to abstract dangerous crime which implements legislators’ intent on early-stage penalty and liability for the deterrence purpose. After that, the following sentences of fake oil events involving Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co. and Flavor Full Co. applied the regulation above. However, whether the scope of applying the act should stick to food safety itself or expand to food fraud brings about entirely different outcomes. So far, affiliated criminal laws of the Act, in addition to including abstract dangerous crime, not only add a new element of crime: “may be sufficient to harmful to human health” but retain the element: “are committed to the detriment of human health” at the same time, legislators seem to consider that danger exists different levels along with time sequence. Therefore, this thesis attempts to probe into research the Act on the basis of the concept of “danger” as well as the types of dangerous crime and reflect on the fact of the excessive expansion of the Act. HSU, YU-AN 徐育安 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 168 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 東吳大學 === 法律學系 === 104 === While dealing with the issues of food safety under our criminal justice system, actus reus contains dangerous crime in both the Criminal Code and affiliated criminal laws of the Act Governing Food (Safety) and Sanitation (“the Act”). In theory, dangerous crime shall be an exception since it simplifies liability of crime to achieve the purpose of protecting legal interests in an early stage. However, since late 20th century, abstract dangerous crime increases rapidly and heavily in the area of affiliated criminal laws of environmental law, economical law, etc. To the legislation tendency above including early-stage and severe criminal liability, scholars call “Risk Criminal Law” to describe the phenomenon of modern criminal law, high abstraction of protected legal interests, as well as symbolization of criminal law. Meanwhile, this trend reflects on legal amendments of affiliated criminal laws of the Act since the plasticizer crisis broke out. The plasticizer crisis in 2011 became one of the most significant events in food safety history in Taiwan, it not only recalled awareness of food safety, but also impelled a series of legal amendments. However, legislators imputed the crisis to light penalty and liability and never try to review and the whole Act. This treatment although can calm public uneasy mood, such actions are palliatives. Predictably, while ability of illegal discovery of the authority does not catch up, a part of the owners of the food industries would rather take their chance in order to cost down and earn profit. As expected, after the poisoned starch crisis breaking out in May 2013, legislators realized the importance of precaution against food safety issues. Nonetheless, they never give up aggravating penalty and liability as their main sanction. Meanwhile, the Act attributed specific behavior such as “manufacturing or selling food that have been adulterated or counterfeited” or “containing food additives that are not approved by the central competent authority” to abstract dangerous crime which implements legislators’ intent on early-stage penalty and liability for the deterrence purpose. After that, the following sentences of fake oil events involving Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co. and Flavor Full Co. applied the regulation above. However, whether the scope of applying the act should stick to food safety itself or expand to food fraud brings about entirely different outcomes. So far, affiliated criminal laws of the Act, in addition to including abstract dangerous crime, not only add a new element of crime: “may be sufficient to harmful to human health” but retain the element: “are committed to the detriment of human health” at the same time, legislators seem to consider that danger exists different levels along with time sequence. Therefore, this thesis attempts to probe into research the Act on the basis of the concept of “danger” as well as the types of dangerous crime and reflect on the fact of the excessive expansion of the Act.
author2 HSU, YU-AN
author_facet HSU, YU-AN
SUNG, FENG-CHUN
宋豐浚
author SUNG, FENG-CHUN
宋豐浚
spellingShingle SUNG, FENG-CHUN
宋豐浚
The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety
author_sort SUNG, FENG-CHUN
title The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety
title_short The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety
title_full The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety
title_fullStr The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety
title_full_unstemmed The Study of Potential Damage Offense—Focusing on Criminal Law in Food Safety
title_sort study of potential damage offense—focusing on criminal law in food safety
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/admk7h
work_keys_str_mv AT sungfengchun thestudyofpotentialdamageoffensefocusingoncriminallawinfoodsafety
AT sòngfēngjùn thestudyofpotentialdamageoffensefocusingoncriminallawinfoodsafety
AT sungfengchun wēixiǎnfànzhīyánjiūyǐshípǐnānquánzhīxíngfǎguīfànwèizhōngxīn
AT sòngfēngjùn wēixiǎnfànzhīyánjiūyǐshípǐnānquánzhīxíngfǎguīfànwèizhōngxīn
AT sungfengchun studyofpotentialdamageoffensefocusingoncriminallawinfoodsafety
AT sòngfēngjùn studyofpotentialdamageoffensefocusingoncriminallawinfoodsafety
_version_ 1719132180412628992