A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 國家發展研究所 === 104 === This thesis focuses on the justification of taxicab regulation, especially market entry regulations. Uber Technologies Inc. (Uber) is currently impacting Taiwan taxicab industry. Regarding how to deal with Uber, some people suggest enforcing laws to ban Uber, wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jo-Yu Cheng, 鄭若妤
Other Authors: 劉靜怡
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/exvf8v
id ndltd-TW-104NTU05011048
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104NTU050110482019-05-15T23:01:19Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/exvf8v A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation 市場進入管制正當性之研究—從Uber對我國計程車管制之衝擊談起 Jo-Yu Cheng 鄭若妤 碩士 國立臺灣大學 國家發展研究所 104 This thesis focuses on the justification of taxicab regulation, especially market entry regulations. Uber Technologies Inc. (Uber) is currently impacting Taiwan taxicab industry. Regarding how to deal with Uber, some people suggest enforcing laws to ban Uber, while others suggest amending laws to allow Uber. The result may bring a sea change in the taxicab regulation. This thesis adopts two methods to analyze the involving regulation: constitutional judicial review and regulation theory. Firstly, it clarifies Taiwan Supreme Court’s opinions about the right to work. It then compares Taiwan’s view with German federal supreme court’s view in a well-known case, Pharmacies case, (Apothekenurteil, BVerfGE 7) to establish the standard of constitutional judicial review of the right to work. Furthermore, it suggests how to amend the current taxicab regulations if they are deemed unconstitutional and need to be adjusted in the future. Secondly, through the lens of regulation theory, this thesis reviews regulations which are constitutional but are inefficient and outdated, such as quantitative control (a result of a ragged decision-making process), rigid rate regulation, formalistic minimum capital requirement, and a policy scheme which is over-influenced by industry associations and unions. The intent of this review is to seek a balance in the triangle relationship among government, business owners, and consumers and to assist business adopt Blue Ocean strategy. The government cannot break ranks with the public interests while creating a level playing field for taxicab industry. The regulation of California government—taxation, supervision, and follow-up tracks—merits continuous our government’s attentions. This thesis provides specific amendments to deregulate and policy proposals to help taxicab industry to diversify to turn the tides. These suggestions are for future policy change and legislation when taxicab industry embraces new technology. 劉靜怡 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 166 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 國家發展研究所 === 104 === This thesis focuses on the justification of taxicab regulation, especially market entry regulations. Uber Technologies Inc. (Uber) is currently impacting Taiwan taxicab industry. Regarding how to deal with Uber, some people suggest enforcing laws to ban Uber, while others suggest amending laws to allow Uber. The result may bring a sea change in the taxicab regulation. This thesis adopts two methods to analyze the involving regulation: constitutional judicial review and regulation theory. Firstly, it clarifies Taiwan Supreme Court’s opinions about the right to work. It then compares Taiwan’s view with German federal supreme court’s view in a well-known case, Pharmacies case, (Apothekenurteil, BVerfGE 7) to establish the standard of constitutional judicial review of the right to work. Furthermore, it suggests how to amend the current taxicab regulations if they are deemed unconstitutional and need to be adjusted in the future. Secondly, through the lens of regulation theory, this thesis reviews regulations which are constitutional but are inefficient and outdated, such as quantitative control (a result of a ragged decision-making process), rigid rate regulation, formalistic minimum capital requirement, and a policy scheme which is over-influenced by industry associations and unions. The intent of this review is to seek a balance in the triangle relationship among government, business owners, and consumers and to assist business adopt Blue Ocean strategy. The government cannot break ranks with the public interests while creating a level playing field for taxicab industry. The regulation of California government—taxation, supervision, and follow-up tracks—merits continuous our government’s attentions. This thesis provides specific amendments to deregulate and policy proposals to help taxicab industry to diversify to turn the tides. These suggestions are for future policy change and legislation when taxicab industry embraces new technology.
author2 劉靜怡
author_facet 劉靜怡
Jo-Yu Cheng
鄭若妤
author Jo-Yu Cheng
鄭若妤
spellingShingle Jo-Yu Cheng
鄭若妤
A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation
author_sort Jo-Yu Cheng
title A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation
title_short A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation
title_full A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation
title_fullStr A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation
title_full_unstemmed A Study on the Justifications for market entry regulation-Focused on the Impact of Uber on the Taxi Regulation
title_sort study on the justifications for market entry regulation-focused on the impact of uber on the taxi regulation
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/exvf8v
work_keys_str_mv AT joyucheng astudyonthejustificationsformarketentryregulationfocusedontheimpactofuberonthetaxiregulation
AT zhèngruòyú astudyonthejustificationsformarketentryregulationfocusedontheimpactofuberonthetaxiregulation
AT joyucheng shìchǎngjìnrùguǎnzhìzhèngdāngxìngzhīyánjiūcónguberduìwǒguójìchéngchēguǎnzhìzhīchōngjītánqǐ
AT zhèngruòyú shìchǎngjìnrùguǎnzhìzhèngdāngxìngzhīyánjiūcónguberduìwǒguójìchéngchēguǎnzhìzhīchōngjītánqǐ
AT joyucheng studyonthejustificationsformarketentryregulationfocusedontheimpactofuberonthetaxiregulation
AT zhèngruòyú studyonthejustificationsformarketentryregulationfocusedontheimpactofuberonthetaxiregulation
_version_ 1719138989078740992