A Study on the Performance Evaluation Method of Disaster Resistant Community – the Case of Mudslide Disaster Resistant Community in New Taipei City

• Main Authors: Chiu,Wei-Ting, 邱瑋亭
• Other Authors: Chan, Shih-Liang
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2016
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/9ax79g

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 都市計劃研究所 === 104 === It’s been an effort for many governments to actively promote disaster resistant community by advocating community participation. Our government also tried to achieve the purpose through top-down planning. However, the appropriate approach to assess the effectiveness of the policy implementation is still under development. Thus, this study chooses 47 Mudslide Disaster Resistant Community in New Taipei City, which are the earliest and most representative, to establish a performance evaluation method for the evaluation of the disaster resistant community implementation . In this study, we first collect the disaster resistant community performance indicators by literature review. Secondly, by using Fuzzy Delphi Technique to filter the most important indicators. Furthermore, we collected the primary data of indicators through community survey. In the end, we respectively assess the Performance of Mudslide Disaster Resistant Community in New Taipei City through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and analyze the difference between two methods. According to the results, the study concludes that the input/cost criterion includes: Disaster Prevention and Response Training Courses, Disaster Prevention Information, Government Subsidies, Establishment of Disaster Response Organizations; and output /benefit criteria includes: Strengthen community’s disaster resistant and response capacity, Establish the ability of self-propelled and self-resistant. According the DEA and TOPSIS analysis of this study, those efficient and well performance community mostly are more significant in criterion: “the number of self-disaster-prevention drills”, “the number of participants of self-disaster-prevention drills”, “cooperation with relevant organizations.” After we compare these two methods, we find the weights of the assessment criterion play the main role in the analysis results.