Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 統計學系 === 104 === Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is often used in the assessment of a medical decision. Individualized CEA uses regression models to predict cost and effect simultaneously; then, the predicted values for cost and effect are used to calculate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: WU,JING-YI, 吳軍毅
Other Authors: LIN,JIAN-FU
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13383369883876338189
id ndltd-TW-104NTPU0337042
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104NTPU03370422016-11-05T04:15:19Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13383369883876338189 Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 個人化成本效益分析與效用分配為雙峰之預測模型選擇 WU,JING-YI 吳軍毅 碩士 國立臺北大學 統計學系 104 Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is often used in the assessment of a medical decision. Individualized CEA uses regression models to predict cost and effect simultaneously; then, the predicted values for cost and effect are used to calculate the individualized incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In surgical researches, the marginal distribution of the effect variable is often bimodal. It is unclear how to select the best prediction model for the bimodal distribution of the effect variable to calculate the individualized ICER. In this study, we use simulation to assess four different prediction models for the bimodal distribution, including linear regression, beta regression, boosted beta regression and ordinal regression model with cubic spline. We simulated linear and non-linear bimodal distributions based on eight scenarios. We used 10-fold cross validation to compare different prediction models and different scenarios. We also compared different prediction models by analyzing random samples from a real population database. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by calculating individualized ICER based on random samples from a real population database. We found that linear beta regression had best performance in terms of prediction error from corss-validation for bimodal distributions. However, in real data analysis, we found that ordinal regression with cubic spline had best performance for bimodal distributions. In the sensitivity analysis, we found that linear beta regression and ordinal regression cubic spline were all suitable for calculating individualized ICER. we also found that the performances were often interfered by those outliers in a random sample. The prediction models' performances are usually influenced by different contexts. Bimodal distributions, the number of covariates, collinearity among covariates and outliers all affect the prediction models' performances. We suggest conducting a sensitivity analysis before we select a prediction model to calculate individualized ICER. LIN,JIAN-FU 林建甫 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 45 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 統計學系 === 104 === Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is often used in the assessment of a medical decision. Individualized CEA uses regression models to predict cost and effect simultaneously; then, the predicted values for cost and effect are used to calculate the individualized incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In surgical researches, the marginal distribution of the effect variable is often bimodal. It is unclear how to select the best prediction model for the bimodal distribution of the effect variable to calculate the individualized ICER. In this study, we use simulation to assess four different prediction models for the bimodal distribution, including linear regression, beta regression, boosted beta regression and ordinal regression model with cubic spline. We simulated linear and non-linear bimodal distributions based on eight scenarios. We used 10-fold cross validation to compare different prediction models and different scenarios. We also compared different prediction models by analyzing random samples from a real population database. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by calculating individualized ICER based on random samples from a real population database. We found that linear beta regression had best performance in terms of prediction error from corss-validation for bimodal distributions. However, in real data analysis, we found that ordinal regression with cubic spline had best performance for bimodal distributions. In the sensitivity analysis, we found that linear beta regression and ordinal regression cubic spline were all suitable for calculating individualized ICER. we also found that the performances were often interfered by those outliers in a random sample. The prediction models' performances are usually influenced by different contexts. Bimodal distributions, the number of covariates, collinearity among covariates and outliers all affect the prediction models' performances. We suggest conducting a sensitivity analysis before we select a prediction model to calculate individualized ICER.
author2 LIN,JIAN-FU
author_facet LIN,JIAN-FU
WU,JING-YI
吳軍毅
author WU,JING-YI
吳軍毅
spellingShingle WU,JING-YI
吳軍毅
Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
author_sort WU,JING-YI
title Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Model Selection for the Bimodal Effect in Individual Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort model selection for the bimodal effect in individual cost-effectiveness analysis
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13383369883876338189
work_keys_str_mv AT wujingyi modelselectionforthebimodaleffectinindividualcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT wújūnyì modelselectionforthebimodaleffectinindividualcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT wujingyi gèrénhuàchéngběnxiàoyìfēnxīyǔxiàoyòngfēnpèiwèishuāngfēngzhīyùcèmóxíngxuǎnzé
AT wújūnyì gèrénhuàchéngběnxiàoyìfēnxīyǔxiàoyòngfēnpèiwèishuāngfēngzhīyùcèmóxíngxuǎnzé
_version_ 1718391087250276352