| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 犯罪學研究所 === 104 === Councilors’ Suggestive Fund, a financial subsidy under our local autonomy system, is for keeping the harmony between the office and council as well as advancing the implementation quality of local government. However, it is frequently been blamed for misused by the councilors to ingratiate themselves with their voters and supporters, even leads to over budgeting.
This study is based on concluding related judgments and studies of Councilors’ Suggestive Fund and crimes involved in this area and analyzes the characteristics of modus operandi. This study also raises the concrete suggestions and strategies in terms of how to prevent the crime of Councilors’ Suggestive Fund.
The method of research is mainly based on “content analysis”, we have found that the main modus operandi can be divided into “uncorruption modus” and “corruption modus” depend on the civil servant were involved or not. Uncorruption modus can be subdivided into “basic style” and “infringe Civil Servants Election and Recall Act style”. Corruption modus can be subdivided into “basic style”, “sell councilors’ suggestive fund style”, ”false information style”, “self-interested style” and “complex style”.
The results found that（1 ）broker groups through crime of Councilors’ Suggestive Fund, （2) the councilor simultaneously concurs the multiple roles, (3) the skillful method to exaggerate and offer commission, (4) the case excavates not easily and (5) local government is part of crime structure.
In order to reduce the illegal behavior, this paper suggests a clear and transparent legislation to involve the citizens in regulating and monitoring the budgeting of the fund.
|
|---|
