| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系 === 104 === Basketball referee plays an important role in a basketball game. In the whole game, the number of misjudgments is also related to the emergence of the wonderful game, and the researcher's work also served as referee, has experienced a misjudgment cases, I want to be research to understand the referee misjudgment of psychological factors and coping strategies, but because quantitative research does not render ideas referee in the game misjudged the mood and complex phenomenon, so in this study by way of qualitative research, to in-depth study on the basketball referee misjudgment psychological factors and coping strategies. A study of six stages and having a certificate of international basketball referee , with semi-structured interviews, interview time was thirty minutes, and analyzed using grounded theory. The results found that the type of referee misjudged are: "Rules misquoted", "should not call but call," "should call but not call," "inconsistencies between the referee opinions or ideas." Misjudgment on psychological factors are: "pressure game", "overconfidence" and "burnout." On coping strategies on three factors respectively, each of the two practices: In the game response to pressure games as "communication between partners", "communicate with the coach or the players," overconfidence in the coping strategies of "Videotape discussion "" familiar with the situation of the game "in the burnout coping strategies as" psychological skills training "," appropriate arrangements for the game. " This study concludes that basketball referee psychological state at the time of the, misjudgment with their coping strategies to reduce misjudgments generated.
|
|---|
