The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting

碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 政治學研究所 === 104 === One’s political opinion and action may possibly be influenced by the majority of certain communities. In a study, Diana C. Mutz (2002) found the condition that network of political discussion, the higher heterogeneity the community is, the lower the voting partic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Chuan Peng, 彭伊絹
Other Authors: Frank Cheng-shan Liu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/19076472493310690345
id ndltd-TW-104NSYS5227021
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104NSYS52270212017-07-30T04:41:16Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/19076472493310690345 The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting 政治談論與選擇性接觸媒體對於投票參與的影響 Yi-Chuan Peng 彭伊絹 碩士 國立中山大學 政治學研究所 104 One’s political opinion and action may possibly be influenced by the majority of certain communities. In a study, Diana C. Mutz (2002) found the condition that network of political discussion, the higher heterogeneity the community is, the lower the voting participation is. However, does the model apply to Taiwan? How well does it explain Taiwanese voters’ vote intension and participation? Studies also suggest that the mass media also played an important role. People may enhance their political beliefs by selectively watching news programs. I make a further corollary: The level of network heterogeneity matters little when individuals conduct “selective exposure.” In order to verify my hypotheses, I conduct a two-stage study. The first-stage data came from a face-to-face survey project TEDS2012 , while the second, from a web survey provided by smilepoll.tw. The data are used for explaining whether heterogeneity of network of political discussion and selective exposure towards media affect the vote intention and participation. The results show that: people in the network with high heterogeneity are less likely to vote, especially the willingness to take part in the pre-election voting. Mutz study was confirmed, and this study supplements it with selective exposure perspective and evidence. The results also shows that the "selective exposure" plays a moderation role. It has an inhibiting effect between network heterogeneity of political discussion and the vote participation. As there haven’t had any empirical evidence by using the selective exposure perspective as a solution to explain the connection between network heterogeneity and voting behavior. Therefore, this study contributes the initial step of this inquiry but demands further studies for more clear pictures. Frank Cheng-shan Liu 劉正山 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 156 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 政治學研究所 === 104 === One’s political opinion and action may possibly be influenced by the majority of certain communities. In a study, Diana C. Mutz (2002) found the condition that network of political discussion, the higher heterogeneity the community is, the lower the voting participation is. However, does the model apply to Taiwan? How well does it explain Taiwanese voters’ vote intension and participation? Studies also suggest that the mass media also played an important role. People may enhance their political beliefs by selectively watching news programs. I make a further corollary: The level of network heterogeneity matters little when individuals conduct “selective exposure.” In order to verify my hypotheses, I conduct a two-stage study. The first-stage data came from a face-to-face survey project TEDS2012 , while the second, from a web survey provided by smilepoll.tw. The data are used for explaining whether heterogeneity of network of political discussion and selective exposure towards media affect the vote intention and participation. The results show that: people in the network with high heterogeneity are less likely to vote, especially the willingness to take part in the pre-election voting. Mutz study was confirmed, and this study supplements it with selective exposure perspective and evidence. The results also shows that the "selective exposure" plays a moderation role. It has an inhibiting effect between network heterogeneity of political discussion and the vote participation. As there haven’t had any empirical evidence by using the selective exposure perspective as a solution to explain the connection between network heterogeneity and voting behavior. Therefore, this study contributes the initial step of this inquiry but demands further studies for more clear pictures.
author2 Frank Cheng-shan Liu
author_facet Frank Cheng-shan Liu
Yi-Chuan Peng
彭伊絹
author Yi-Chuan Peng
彭伊絹
spellingShingle Yi-Chuan Peng
彭伊絹
The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting
author_sort Yi-Chuan Peng
title The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting
title_short The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting
title_full The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting
title_fullStr The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Political Discussion and Selective Exposure on Voting
title_sort effects of political discussion and selective exposure on voting
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/19076472493310690345
work_keys_str_mv AT yichuanpeng theeffectsofpoliticaldiscussionandselectiveexposureonvoting
AT péngyījuàn theeffectsofpoliticaldiscussionandselectiveexposureonvoting
AT yichuanpeng zhèngzhìtánlùnyǔxuǎnzéxìngjiēchùméitǐduìyútóupiàocānyǔdeyǐngxiǎng
AT péngyījuàn zhèngzhìtánlùnyǔxuǎnzéxìngjiēchùméitǐduìyútóupiàocānyǔdeyǐngxiǎng
AT yichuanpeng effectsofpoliticaldiscussionandselectiveexposureonvoting
AT péngyījuàn effectsofpoliticaldiscussionandselectiveexposureonvoting
_version_ 1718508799118016512