Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy
碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 中國與亞太區域研究所 === 104 === This thesis wrestles with key problems in both international relations theory: What is the nature of the international system? Is the structure of the international system based solely (or even mostly) on material capabilities, or is it really ideas all the w...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2016
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/qau94y |
id |
ndltd-TW-104NSYS5025050 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-104NSYS50250502019-05-15T23:01:39Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/qau94y Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy 國際政治地位理論: 日本的外交和安全政策個案研究 Nathan William Novak 李漢聲 碩士 國立中山大學 中國與亞太區域研究所 104 This thesis wrestles with key problems in both international relations theory: What is the nature of the international system? Is the structure of the international system based solely (or even mostly) on material capabilities, or is it really ideas all the way (or even most of the way) down? What are the motivations of states? Are states revisionist- or status quo-oriented, are they power or security maximizers, or are they something else altogether? It also deals with key questions regarding Japan''s foreign and security policy: Is Japan a reactive/passive (status-quo) state, or is it proactive (and possibly revisionist)? Can Japan''s foreign policy be described as "hedging" or as a "dual hedge"? What is the best way to conceptualize Japan''s place in the U.S.-Japan alliance or in Japan''s relationship with the People''s Republic of China? In this thesis, the proto-theory of status enhancement is put forth as a viable alternative to all of these questions. Status enhancement argues that, at the very least, most states most of the time--and particularly since the advent of nuclear weapons--are status enhancers, where status is akin to rank in a socially understood hierarchy of states based on "objective" status markers (for example, military and economic capabilities) and "intersubjective" status markers (here specified and defined as influence, authority, legitimacy, and prestige). Status enhancement argues that the structure of the international system is social (harkening back to constructivism) and material (harkening back to Waltzian neorealism) and that the driving force behind state identities, interests, and behaviors is the assertion that states can imagine a better world, that is, one in which they have more and not less control over their external environments (harkening back to neoclassical realism). After dealing with numerous theoretical and practical problems regarding the formation of such a theory, both with regard to international political theory and Japan-specific theories, and defining and operationalizing variables, this thesis then tests status enhancement against the historical period in Sino-Japan and U.S.-Japan relations from September, 2006 to December, 2014. It finds that, although limited in scope, the proto-theory of status enhancement is a potentially viable theory of international politics. Yujen Kuo Lin, Wen-cheng 郭育仁 林文程 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 143 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 中國與亞太區域研究所 === 104 === This thesis wrestles with key problems in both international relations theory: What is the nature of the international system? Is the structure of the international system based solely (or even mostly) on material capabilities, or is it really ideas all the way (or even most of the way) down? What are the motivations of states? Are states revisionist- or status quo-oriented, are they power or security maximizers, or are they something else altogether? It also deals with key questions regarding Japan''s foreign and security policy: Is Japan a reactive/passive (status-quo) state, or is it proactive (and possibly revisionist)? Can Japan''s foreign policy be described as "hedging" or as a "dual hedge"? What is the best way to conceptualize Japan''s place in the U.S.-Japan alliance or in Japan''s relationship with the People''s Republic of China? In this thesis, the proto-theory of status enhancement is put forth as a viable alternative to all of these questions. Status enhancement argues that, at the very least, most states most of the time--and particularly since the advent of nuclear weapons--are status enhancers, where status is akin to rank in a socially understood hierarchy of states based on "objective" status markers (for example, military and economic capabilities) and "intersubjective" status markers (here specified and defined as influence, authority, legitimacy, and prestige). Status enhancement argues that the structure of the international system is social (harkening back to constructivism) and material (harkening back to Waltzian neorealism) and that the driving force behind state identities, interests, and behaviors is the assertion that states can imagine a better world, that is, one in which they have more and not less control over their external environments (harkening back to neoclassical realism). After dealing with numerous theoretical and practical problems regarding the formation of such a theory, both with regard to international political theory and Japan-specific theories, and defining and operationalizing variables, this thesis then tests status enhancement against the historical period in Sino-Japan and U.S.-Japan relations from September, 2006 to December, 2014. It finds that, although limited in scope, the proto-theory of status enhancement is a potentially viable theory of international politics.
|
author2 |
Yujen Kuo |
author_facet |
Yujen Kuo Nathan William Novak 李漢聲 |
author |
Nathan William Novak 李漢聲 |
spellingShingle |
Nathan William Novak 李漢聲 Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy |
author_sort |
Nathan William Novak |
title |
Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy |
title_short |
Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy |
title_full |
Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy |
title_fullStr |
Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Status Theory of International Politics: A Case Study of Japan''s Foreign and Security Policy |
title_sort |
status theory of international politics: a case study of japan''s foreign and security policy |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/qau94y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nathanwilliamnovak statustheoryofinternationalpoliticsacasestudyofjapanaposapossforeignandsecuritypolicy AT lǐhànshēng statustheoryofinternationalpoliticsacasestudyofjapanaposapossforeignandsecuritypolicy AT nathanwilliamnovak guójìzhèngzhìdewèilǐlùnrìběndewàijiāohéānquánzhèngcègèànyánjiū AT lǐhànshēng guójìzhèngzhìdewèilǐlùnrìběndewàijiāohéānquánzhèngcègèànyánjiū |
_version_ |
1719139615203393536 |