| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立屏東大學 === 不動產經營學系碩士班 === 104 === In urban plan, urban land consolidation is one of the important ways of land de-velopment. Property value is the feature of economic boom in the city. It also reflects the citizens’ tendencies to choosing housing and development of the city.
This is a qualitative research. The complete urban land consolidation area in Pingtung County was the subject in study. The first aim of the research was to analyze the distribution of urban land consolidation in Pingtung County. The second purpose was to investigate the changes of implementing urban land consolidation on housing price. The in-depth interviews were conducted to explore the effect of urban land consolidation and difficulties in implementing urban land consolidation today.
The findings from case study are presented as below: from the Shuiyuan urban land consolidation in 1974, there were 27 urban land consolidations completed until now, including 8 government sponsored urban land consolidations and 19 private sponsored urban land consolidations. Take Shuiyuan urban land consolidation (1996-2014) for example, the property value has raised from 28 thousands per square meters to 52 thousands per square meters. The average growth rate is 7.72%. The growth rate even up to 7.81% in past five years. Obviously, urban land consolidation brings changes in housing price. Qishun urban land consolidation in Chaozhou town-ship also increased 16.9 % in the past 8 years in Chaozhou township.
The results from interview are showed as the follows: After urban land consoli-dations are finished with completed public facility and comfortable living environ-ment, there is a positive impact on housing price. By fair tax system, idle land and price difference problems during implementing urban consolidations can be solved. Moreover, the influence of inconsistent administrative authority between urban land consolidation and urban plan on choosing redevelopment zones and process of im-plementing urban land consolidation is the biggest problem in Pingtung County. Sec-ondly, because citizens are unfamiliar with the regulations, it reduces their participa-tion in urban land consolidations.
No matter government or private sponsored urban land consolidation they are, it brings positive effectiveness on housing price. The property market is not booming up and the housing price is growing slow in Pingtung County. This study reveals the re-lationship among urban land consolidation area, housing price and urban plan devel-opment that offer valuable suggestion for space planning development and land de-velopment for the future.
|
|---|
