| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立嘉義大學 === 體育與健康休閒學系研究所 === 104 === The aim of this study was to explore Taiwan background variables of the pétanque participant involvement in sports, recreation benefits and quality of life difference, and verifying Taiwan pétanque participants of sports involvement, recreation benefits and the relationship between the quality of life. Taiwan's 18 years of pétanque sport participants for the study to facilitate sampling in a pétanque area parks, schools and clubs and other places of questionnaires were issued 850, questionnaires, 752, effective recovery of 88.5%. Statistical analysis of the data recovery results found: first, the pétanque sport participant background variables analysis showed differences of involvement in sports, gender change of no significant difference. Marital status, level of education, age and occupation variables showed significant differences in the sports involvement. Second, pétanque sport participants of background variables on leisure benefits differences analysis shows, sex and level of education in leisure benefits no significant difference. Monthly income, marital status, age and occupation variables showed significant differences in the leisure benefits. Three background variables, pétanque sport participants differences analysis shows in the quality of life, gender, level of education, monthly income and occupational variables of no significant difference in the quality of life. Marital status and the age variable significant differences in quality of life. Four, verify the pétanque sport participants of sports involvement, recreation benefits and quality of life effects between sports involvement for recreational benefits has a positive effect, sports involvement has positive effects on the quality of life, benefits have positive impact on the quality of life and leisure, recreational benefits in the model is a partial mediator effect. Five, sports involvement could explain leisure benefits 26% explained variance, sports involvement, recreation benefits can explain 29% quality of life variables explained.
|
|---|
