Development and evaluation of the ” Scientific inquiry learning system”

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 網路學習科技研究所 === 104 === Science Fair is an important activity in the field of science education for primary and junior-high schools in Taiwan. Science Fair aims to raise students’ interest in science learning and their scientific inquiry abilities. However, most of students do not ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan-Jou Lin, 林宛柔
Other Authors: Ying-Tien Wu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/48720640503459952634
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 網路學習科技研究所 === 104 === Science Fair is an important activity in the field of science education for primary and junior-high schools in Taiwan. Science Fair aims to raise students’ interest in science learning and their scientific inquiry abilities. However, most of students do not have the abilities to complete the science inquiry alone when they do not have experience of participating Science Fair. The purpose of this study is to guide the students doing the inquiry-based experiments before Science Fair, and to provide the system scaffolds helping students to learn Science Process Skill instructions, the ability used in Science Fair. Science Process Skill Instructions regards as the ability which you solve the science problem. In the Taiwan’s essentials of the 9-Year integrated curriculum, Science Process Skill instructions can be classified into 5 items: “observing”,” comparison and classification”, “organization and the associated”, ”induction , analysis and inference” and “ communicating”. Learners acquire these abilities by doing experience themselves and from the experiment to explore in the process of for the purpose of inquiry experiments. While assessing system, we use “purposive sampling.”. 52 elementary students are invited to use the system and evaluated the system with a quantitative survey. Their responses on the quantitative questionnaire of the system showed that they are satisfied and think this system is useful and user-friendly. They expressed high willingness to use the system continuously. Both Scientific Process Skills and Integration Process Skills improve significantly showed in the questionnaire, but there is no significant difference in Basic Process Skills. In additions, the average improvement score about Integration Process Skills of the experimental group is higher than the control group, which indicates that this system is useful in developing students’ Scientific Process Skills. In the conclusion of this study, this study point out some suggestions on teaching practices, improvement on the system design, and future research.