Exploring the Influence of Anonymous and Named Assessment Mechanism on

• Main Authors: Ting-Wei Fan, 范庭瑋
• Other Authors: 周惠文
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2016
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/n487p3

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 資訊管理學系 === 104 === Due to the assessment was easily affected by assessor’s subjective factors, if the assessment mechanism does not have integrative and complete standards, the corresponding assessment results won’t be fair and objective. The assessment result which came from this assessment mechanism couldn’t fairly and truly reflect assesses’ overall performance, more worthily, it would damage the harmonious atmosphere owing to the inconsistency of the assessment results. This study applied “Group Cooperative Learning” to divide experiment examples into different group, and adopted “Peer-assessment” as an assessment method. This research aims to explore: 1. Whether assessor gave different assessment result on anonymous and named assessment mechanisms? 2. Whether assessor’s gender had different assessment result on anonymous and named assessment mechanisms? How about assessor’s group composition? 3. How individual communicated with its team member? Was the way of communication influence the groups’ discussion result? This study adopted questionnaire and quasi-experimental design, and its data source was drawn from the students of “Organization Behavior” course in a public university in northern Taiwan, including feedback and questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, and reliability analysis techniques were employed to analyze the data. The results found that: 1. Both on anonymous and named assessment mechanisms, females’ assessment results is not easily affected by assessment mechanisms’ change than males’ assessment results. 2. Females might be more suitable to team work than males. They tend to have better group interaction. At the same time, this research also found that mix-gender group had the best team performance. Implications of this study conclude the research.