RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

博士 === 國立交通大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 104 ===  Generally Domestic scholars and judicial personnel on the attitude of obstruction of justice tend to respond negatively; however, the questionnaire surveys conducted by the author of this article revealed that the majority of citizens in this country expressed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiou, Jong-Yi, 邱忠義
Other Authors: Lin, Chih-Chieh
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/7dy8y3
id ndltd-TW-104NCTU5705064
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-104NCTU57050642019-06-27T05:25:48Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/7dy8y3 RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE 妨害司法公正罪之再建構 Chiou, Jong-Yi 邱忠義 博士 國立交通大學 科技法律研究所 104  Generally Domestic scholars and judicial personnel on the attitude of obstruction of justice tend to respond negatively; however, the questionnaire surveys conducted by the author of this article revealed that the majority of citizens in this country expressed their revulsion to obstruction of justice acts. It is obvious that if the problem of obstruction of justice cannot be solved, it will undermine the belief in the impartiality of the judicial system. In order to establish the authority and impartiality of the judicial system and to ensure due process of law, this dissertation referred a variety of theories and practices from developed countries which prohibit all types of obstruction of justice. This dissertation also concludes that people’s trust in the judicial investigations and trials must base on due process of law to discover the truth. The investigation authorities should strictly comply with the principles aforementioned. The defendant or the holders of relevant evidence should assist in discovering the truth on account of the act and omission obligation. Anyone who violates the truth obligation by unlawful means and thus impair the impartiality of the judiciary should be subjected to considerable sanctions, to protect against contamination judicial and make people convinced. Due to these grounds, this dissertation also detailed description of penalty of the obstruction of justice in the American legal system (U.S.C.) is provided as a reference for the legislation of Taiwan.  Furthermore, after comparing Taiwan legal system with the American counterpart, and after quantitative research and qualitative research, the author found that there remains a number of loopholes in the law of obstruction of justice that needs to be closed. Therefore, the author of the dissertation puts forward some proposals to amend the Taiwanese criminal law, hoping to invite domestic academia, Judicial Officers and other legal persons to review, reflect on, and provide some lessons from this study to the legislature to plug these loopholes. Lin, Chih-Chieh 林志潔 2016 學位論文 ; thesis 186 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立交通大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 104 ===  Generally Domestic scholars and judicial personnel on the attitude of obstruction of justice tend to respond negatively; however, the questionnaire surveys conducted by the author of this article revealed that the majority of citizens in this country expressed their revulsion to obstruction of justice acts. It is obvious that if the problem of obstruction of justice cannot be solved, it will undermine the belief in the impartiality of the judicial system. In order to establish the authority and impartiality of the judicial system and to ensure due process of law, this dissertation referred a variety of theories and practices from developed countries which prohibit all types of obstruction of justice. This dissertation also concludes that people’s trust in the judicial investigations and trials must base on due process of law to discover the truth. The investigation authorities should strictly comply with the principles aforementioned. The defendant or the holders of relevant evidence should assist in discovering the truth on account of the act and omission obligation. Anyone who violates the truth obligation by unlawful means and thus impair the impartiality of the judiciary should be subjected to considerable sanctions, to protect against contamination judicial and make people convinced. Due to these grounds, this dissertation also detailed description of penalty of the obstruction of justice in the American legal system (U.S.C.) is provided as a reference for the legislation of Taiwan.  Furthermore, after comparing Taiwan legal system with the American counterpart, and after quantitative research and qualitative research, the author found that there remains a number of loopholes in the law of obstruction of justice that needs to be closed. Therefore, the author of the dissertation puts forward some proposals to amend the Taiwanese criminal law, hoping to invite domestic academia, Judicial Officers and other legal persons to review, reflect on, and provide some lessons from this study to the legislature to plug these loopholes.
author2 Lin, Chih-Chieh
author_facet Lin, Chih-Chieh
Chiou, Jong-Yi
邱忠義
author Chiou, Jong-Yi
邱忠義
spellingShingle Chiou, Jong-Yi
邱忠義
RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
author_sort Chiou, Jong-Yi
title RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
title_short RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
title_full RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
title_fullStr RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
title_full_unstemmed RECONSTRUCTING THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
title_sort reconstructing the crime of obstruction of justice
publishDate 2016
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/7dy8y3
work_keys_str_mv AT chioujongyi reconstructingthecrimeofobstructionofjustice
AT qiūzhōngyì reconstructingthecrimeofobstructionofjustice
AT chioujongyi fánghàisīfǎgōngzhèngzuìzhīzàijiàngòu
AT qiūzhōngyì fánghàisīfǎgōngzhèngzuìzhīzàijiàngòu
_version_ 1719211479728652288